PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZEO.TO vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZEO.TO vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF (ZEO.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZEO.TO is traded in CAD, while SPMO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPMO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZEO.TO achieves a 37.72% return, which is significantly higher than SPMO's 30.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ZEO.TO has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 10.67%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.72% annualized return.


ZEO.TO

1D
0.65%
1M
2.51%
YTD
37.72%
6M
32.21%
1Y
50.73%
3Y*
27.08%
5Y*
25.42%
10Y*
10.67%

SPMO

1D
0.00%
1M
16.60%
YTD
30.82%
6M
28.84%
1Y
46.55%
3Y*
44.27%
5Y*
27.61%
10Y*
21.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZEO.TO vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZEO.TO
BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF
37.72%12.35%21.51%5.98%39.67%63.65%-28.56%16.50%-25.62%-12.74%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
32.01%20.78%58.34%14.97%-4.07%21.54%26.09%19.74%7.49%19.63%

Correlation

The correlation between ZEO.TO and SPMO is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015

0.14

The correlation between ZEO.TO and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZEO.TO vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZEO.TO
SPMO

Energy

100.0%
3.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.6%

Communication Services

-

9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.3%

Financial Services

-

5.9%

Healthcare

-

6.7%

Industrials

-

11.3%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Technology

-

52.6%

Utilities

-

2.8%

Energy

ZEO.TO
100.0%
SPMO
3.4%

Basic Materials

ZEO.TO

-

SPMO
1.6%

Communication Services

ZEO.TO

-

SPMO
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ZEO.TO

-

SPMO
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

ZEO.TO

-

SPMO
4.3%

Financial Services

ZEO.TO

-

SPMO
5.9%

Healthcare

ZEO.TO

-

SPMO
6.7%

Industrials

ZEO.TO

-

SPMO
11.3%

Real Estate

ZEO.TO

-

SPMO
1.0%

Technology

ZEO.TO

-

SPMO
52.6%

Utilities

ZEO.TO

-

SPMO
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZEO.TO vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZEO.TO
ZEO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ZEO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZEO.TO vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF (ZEO.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZEO.TOSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.49

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.34

3.65

+1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.25

12.23

+5.01

ZEO.TO vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZEO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZEO.TO and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZEO.TOSPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02

2.72

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

1.57

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

1.14

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

1.10

-1.10

Drawdowns

ZEO.TO vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZEO.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.71%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -25.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEO.TO and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZEO.TOSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.71%

-25.58%

-52.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-12.82%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-20.26%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.59%

-20.69%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.03%

-25.58%

-46.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.93%

0.00%

-2.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.98%

-4.14%

-17.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.82%

-0.87%

Volatility

ZEO.TO vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF (ZEO.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) have volatilities of 6.99% and 7.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZEO.TOSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

7.29%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.57%

13.95%

+0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.92%

17.23%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.17%

17.71%

+3.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.27%

19.10%

+8.17%

ZEO.TO vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZEO.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZEO.TO vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

ZEO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than SPMO's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.65%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%
ZEO.TO
BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF
2.59%3.42%3.86%4.82%4.69%3.27%5.54%3.55%3.57%2.46%2.50%4.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZEO.TO and SPMO have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ZEO.TO.

ZEO.TO is categorized as Energy Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. ZEO.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Oil & Gas Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ZEO.TO and 0.13% for SPMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZEO.TO and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer