PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZEO.TO vs. ENBE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZEO.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF (ZEO.TO) and Harvest Enbridge Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (ENBE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZEO.TO achieves a 37.42% return, which is significantly higher than ENBE.TO's 18.10% return.


ZEO.TO

1D
-2.24%
1M
6.58%
6M
26.27%
YTD
37.42%
1Y
47.76%
3Y*
24.46%
5Y*
26.62%
10Y*
9.88%
ALL TIME*
4.53%

ENBE.TO

1D
-1.91%
1M
-2.00%
6M
15.12%
YTD
18.10%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$149.02KCA$112.71KCA$72.45K
CA$3.54MCA$2.96MCA$2.91M

ZEO.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZEO.TO and ENBE.TO is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZEO.TO vs. ENBE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZEO.TO
ZEO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ZEO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

ENBE.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZEO.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF (ZEO.TO) and Harvest Enbridge Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (ENBE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZEO.TOENBE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

ZEO.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZEO.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZEO.TO drawdown since its inception was -80.10%, which is greater than ENBE.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEO.TO and ENBE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZEO.TOENBE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.10%

-11.28%

-68.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.57%

-7.07%

+3.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.99%

-3.15%

-21.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

Volatility

ZEO.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZEO.TOENBE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.34%

18.42%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.24%

18.42%

+2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.15%

18.42%

+8.73%

ZEO.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZEO.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ENBE.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZEO.TO vs. ENBE.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZEO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than ENBE.TO's 11.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENBE.TO
Harvest Enbridge Enhanced High Income Shares ETF
11.16%4.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZEO.TO
BMO Equal Weight Oil & Gas Index ETF
2.74%3.43%3.86%4.82%4.69%3.27%5.54%3.55%0.71%0.49%0.47%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZEO.TO and ENBE.TO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ENBE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ENBE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ZEO.TO.

ZEO.TO is categorized as Energy Equities, while ENBE.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ZEO.TO and 0.40% for ENBE.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZEO.TO and ENBE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer