PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZECP vs. FTGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZECP vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZECP achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly lower than FTGC's 16.89% return.


ZECP

1D
0.08%
1M
0.13%
YTD
6.73%
6M
5.35%
1Y
18.92%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
10Y*

FTGC

1D
-1.65%
1M
-8.90%
YTD
16.89%
6M
15.85%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
13.63%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
6.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZECP vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ZECP
Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF
6.73%15.03%17.32%13.88%-13.41%7.62%
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
16.89%14.61%9.96%-5.36%17.36%7.07%

Correlation

The correlation between ZECP and FTGC is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2021

0.14

The correlation between ZECP and FTGC shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZECP vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZECP
ZECP Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ZECP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZECP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZECP Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ZECP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZECP Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FTGC
FTGC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZECP vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZECPFTGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.33

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

2.31

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.37

9.40

+0.97

ZECP vs. FTGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZECP Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the FTGC Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZECP and FTGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZECP vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZECP drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, smaller than the maximum FTGC drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZECP and FTGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZECPFTGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.86%

-59.47%

+37.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.32%

-12.34%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.47%

-12.34%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-12.34%

+11.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-27.33%

+21.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

3.02%

-1.19%

Volatility

ZECP vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison

Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) have volatilities of 3.19% and 3.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZECPFTGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

3.33%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.43%

13.32%

-4.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.74%

15.64%

-4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.62%

15.89%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.62%

14.72%

-0.10%

ZECP vs. FTGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZECP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZECP vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison

ZECP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than FTGC's 16.40% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
16.40%17.74%3.05%3.34%10.35%7.21%0.00%0.81%0.80%1.21%
ZECP
Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF
0.74%0.79%0.63%0.73%0.91%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZECP and FTGC have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTGC has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to ZECP (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZECP dropped -21.86% vs FTGC's -59.47%.

On 3-year performance, ZECP leads with 15.63% vs 13.63% for FTGC. On fees, ZECP is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ZECP has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ZECP has performed better with a 15.63% return vs 13.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZECP is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.

FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 16.40%, compared with 0.74% for ZECP.

ZECP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FTGC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Zacks and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ZECP and 0.95% for FTGC.

FTGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZECP and FTGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer