ZEB.TO vs. ZIN.TO
ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) and ZIN.TO (BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while ZIN.TO is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZEB.TO returned 16.60%/yr vs 13.64%/yr for ZIN.TO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZEB.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for ZIN.TO.
Performance
ZEB.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZEB.TO achieves a 25.33% return, which is significantly higher than ZIN.TO's 20.76% return. Over the past 10 years, ZEB.TO has outperformed ZIN.TO with an annualized return of 16.60%, while ZIN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.64% annualized return.
ZEB.TO
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 9.87%
- YTD
- 25.33%
- 6M
- 26.07%
- 1Y
- 67.94%
- 3Y*
- 34.82%
- 5Y*
- 19.53%
- 10Y*
- 16.60%
ZIN.TO
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 20.76%
- 6M
- 20.78%
- 1Y
- 38.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
ZEB.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 25.33% | 43.43% | 24.58% | 10.87% | -10.38% | 39.38% | 3.52% | 16.06% | -8.85% | 14.26% |
ZIN.TO BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF | 20.76% | 16.80% | 16.33% | 19.36% | -8.05% | 17.86% | 6.62% | 22.67% | -6.61% | 17.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZEB.TO and ZIN.TO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2012 | 0.45 |
The correlation between ZEB.TO and ZIN.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZEB.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZEB.TO
ZIN.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
ZEB.TO
ZIN.TO
Basic Materials
ZEB.TO
-
ZIN.TO
Communication Services
ZEB.TO
-
ZIN.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZEB.TO
-
ZIN.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZEB.TO
-
ZIN.TO
-
Energy
ZEB.TO
-
ZIN.TO
Healthcare
ZEB.TO
-
ZIN.TO
-
Industrials
ZEB.TO
-
ZIN.TO
Real Estate
ZEB.TO
-
ZIN.TO
Technology
ZEB.TO
-
ZIN.TO
-
Utilities
ZEB.TO
-
ZIN.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZEB.TO vs. ZIN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZEB.TO
ZIN.TO
ZEB.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZEB.TO | ZIN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.99 | 1.44 | +0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.09 | 4.73 | +3.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.80 | 16.59 | +18.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZEB.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, smaller than the maximum ZIN.TO drawdown of -44.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEB.TO and ZIN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZEB.TO | ZIN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.69% | -44.01% | +4.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -8.10% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.80% | -22.39% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.97% | -23.10% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | -44.01% | +4.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.95% | +2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -5.79% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 2.30% | -0.34% |
Volatility
ZEB.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) is 4.52%, while BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN.TO) has a volatility of 4.99%. This indicates that ZEB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZIN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZEB.TO | ZIN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 4.99% | -0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.13% | 12.05% | -0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.81% | 15.15% | -2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.55% | 16.79% | -3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 18.07% | -1.17% |
ZEB.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZEB.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIN.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZEB.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than ZIN.TO's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.41% | 2.95% | 3.98% | 4.75% | 4.29% | 3.13% | 4.15% | 3.65% | 3.64% | 3.02% | 3.19% | 3.70% |
ZIN.TO BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF | 0.97% | 1.22% | 1.42% | 1.68% | 2.01% | 1.84% | 2.10% | 2.32% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZEB.TO and ZIN.TO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZEB.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZEB.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZIN.TO.
ZEB.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while ZIN.TO is Industrials Equities. ZEB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while ZIN.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ZEB.TO and 0.61% for ZIN.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZEB.TO and ZIN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer