ZEB.TO vs. VGG.TO
ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) and VGG.TO (Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while VGG.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZEB.TO returned 16.60%/yr vs 13.63%/yr for VGG.TO. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZEB.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VGG.TO.
Performance
ZEB.TO vs. VGG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZEB.TO achieves a 25.33% return, which is significantly higher than VGG.TO's 9.29% return. Over the past 10 years, ZEB.TO has outperformed VGG.TO with an annualized return of 16.60%, while VGG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.63% annualized return.
ZEB.TO
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 9.87%
- YTD
- 25.33%
- 6M
- 26.07%
- 1Y
- 67.94%
- 3Y*
- 34.82%
- 5Y*
- 19.53%
- 10Y*
- 16.60%
VGG.TO
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 20.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- 13.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
ZEB.TO vs. VGG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 25.33% | 43.43% | 24.58% | 10.87% | -10.38% | 39.38% | 3.52% | 16.06% | -8.85% | 14.26% |
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 9.29% | 8.61% | 26.49% | 11.58% | -4.21% | 22.23% | 12.67% | 23.32% | 5.20% | 13.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZEB.TO and VGG.TO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2013 | 0.46 |
The correlation between ZEB.TO and VGG.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZEB.TO vs. VGG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZEB.TO
VGG.TO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
ZEB.TO
VGG.TO
Basic Materials
ZEB.TO
-
VGG.TO
Communication Services
ZEB.TO
-
VGG.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZEB.TO
-
VGG.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZEB.TO
-
VGG.TO
Energy
ZEB.TO
-
VGG.TO
Healthcare
ZEB.TO
-
VGG.TO
Industrials
ZEB.TO
-
VGG.TO
Real Estate
ZEB.TO
-
VGG.TO
-
Technology
ZEB.TO
-
VGG.TO
Utilities
ZEB.TO
-
VGG.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZEB.TO vs. VGG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZEB.TO
VGG.TO
ZEB.TO vs. VGG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZEB.TO | VGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.99 | 1.36 | +0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.09 | 2.97 | +5.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.80 | 11.06 | +23.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZEB.TO vs. VGG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZEB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.69%, which is greater than VGG.TO's maximum drawdown of -24.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEB.TO and VGG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZEB.TO | VGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.69% | -24.58% | -15.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.44% | -7.07% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.80% | -15.56% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.97% | -18.52% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | -24.58% | -15.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -2.93% | -2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 1.90% | +0.06% |
Volatility
ZEB.TO vs. VGG.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) at 3.08%. This indicates that ZEB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZEB.TO | VGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 3.08% | +1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.13% | 8.03% | +3.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.81% | 10.34% | +2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.55% | 12.67% | +0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 14.99% | +1.91% |
ZEB.TO vs. VGG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZEB.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than VGG.TO's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZEB.TO vs. VGG.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZEB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than VGG.TO's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 1.01% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 1.35% | 1.21% | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.70% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.41% | 2.95% | 3.98% | 4.75% | 4.29% | 3.13% | 4.15% | 3.65% | 3.64% | 3.02% | 3.19% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZEB.TO and VGG.TO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZEB.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZEB.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VGG.TO.
ZEB.TO is categorized as Financials Equities, while VGG.TO is Dividend. ZEB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index, while VGG.TO tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ZEB.TO and 0.30% for VGG.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZEB.TO and VGG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer