ZEA.TO vs. VIDY.TO
ZEA.TO (BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF) and VIDY.TO (Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - ZEA.TO tracks the MSCI EAFE Index while VIDY.TO tracks the FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZEA.TO returned 11.38%/yr vs 15.58%/yr for VIDY.TO. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZEA.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for VIDY.TO.
Performance
ZEA.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZEA.TO achieves a 12.12% return, which is significantly lower than VIDY.TO's 13.09% return.
ZEA.TO
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 12.12%
- 6M
- 12.00%
- 1Y
- 24.12%
- 3Y*
- 19.22%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 10.70%
VIDY.TO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 6M
- 13.18%
- 1Y
- 30.55%
- 3Y*
- 23.79%
- 5Y*
- 15.58%
- 10Y*
- —
ZEA.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZEA.TO BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF | 12.12% | 24.92% | 11.58% | 16.04% | -8.50% | 10.66% | 5.15% | 16.72% | -8.19% |
VIDY.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 13.09% | 35.07% | 11.97% | 15.46% | 1.57% | 14.26% | -2.63% | 12.64% | -6.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZEA.TO and VIDY.TO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2018 | 0.79 |
The correlation between ZEA.TO and VIDY.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZEA.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZEA.TO
VIDY.TO
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
ZEA.TO
VIDY.TO
Industrials
ZEA.TO
VIDY.TO
Technology
ZEA.TO
VIDY.TO
Healthcare
ZEA.TO
VIDY.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZEA.TO
VIDY.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZEA.TO
VIDY.TO
Basic Materials
ZEA.TO
VIDY.TO
Communication Services
ZEA.TO
VIDY.TO
Energy
ZEA.TO
VIDY.TO
Utilities
ZEA.TO
VIDY.TO
Real Estate
ZEA.TO
VIDY.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZEA.TO vs. VIDY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZEA.TO
VIDY.TO
ZEA.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO) and Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VIDY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZEA.TO | VIDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.42 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 2.93 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.56 | 11.27 | -2.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZEA.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZEA.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.80%, smaller than the maximum VIDY.TO drawdown of -31.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEA.TO and VIDY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZEA.TO | VIDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.80% | -31.99% | +4.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.91% | -10.48% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.11% | -13.89% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.66% | -19.01% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.09% | -0.91% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.61% | -4.25% | -0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.72% | +0.11% |
Volatility
ZEA.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VIDY.TO) at 3.65%. This indicates that ZEA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIDY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZEA.TO | VIDY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 3.65% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 10.92% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.51% | 13.36% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 13.51% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.79% | 16.43% | -1.64% |
ZEA.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZEA.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than VIDY.TO's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZEA.TO vs. VIDY.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZEA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than VIDY.TO's 2.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIDY.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 2.98% | 2.80% | 3.64% | 3.91% | 4.39% | 3.30% | 3.36% | 3.37% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZEA.TO BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF | 1.90% | 2.17% | 2.78% | 3.02% | 3.08% | 2.49% | 2.74% | 2.95% | 3.05% | 2.40% | 2.80% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZEA.TO and VIDY.TO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZEA.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZEA.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for VIDY.TO.
ZEA.TO tracks MSCI EAFE Index, while VIDY.TO tracks FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ZEA.TO and 0.31% for VIDY.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZEA.TO and VIDY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer