ZDV.TO vs. PDC.TO
ZDV.TO (BMO Canadian Dividend ETF) and PDC.TO (Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZDV.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while PDC.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the NASDAQ Select Canadian Dividend Index. ZDV.TO is actively managed, while PDC.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZDV.TO returned 12.33%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for PDC.TO. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ZDV.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDC.TO.
Performance
ZDV.TO vs. PDC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZDV.TO achieves a 23.19% return, which is significantly lower than PDC.TO's 25.42% return. Over the past 10 years, ZDV.TO has outperformed PDC.TO with an annualized return of 12.33%, while PDC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.43% annualized return.
ZDV.TO
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- 6M
- 19.40%
- YTD
- 23.19%
- 1Y
- 42.82%
- 3Y*
- 24.48%
- 5Y*
- 16.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.06%
PDC.TO
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 22.87%
- YTD
- 25.42%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$73.82K | CA$71.46K | CA$90.55K | |
| CA$1.53M | CA$1.72M | CA$1.71M |
ZDV.TO vs. PDC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZDV.TO BMO Canadian Dividend ETF | 23.19% | 28.82% | 16.83% | 8.14% | -1.66% | 28.75% | -3.51% | 22.89% | -10.76% | 7.46% |
PDC.TO Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF | 25.42% | 21.80% | 16.38% | 6.97% | -4.17% | 30.14% | -5.48% | 25.00% | -11.85% | 10.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZDV.TO and PDC.TO is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2011 | 0.81 |
The correlation between ZDV.TO and PDC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ZDV.TO vs. PDC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZDV.TO
PDC.TO
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Industrials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
ZDV.TO
PDC.TO
Energy
ZDV.TO
PDC.TO
Basic Materials
ZDV.TO
PDC.TO
Utilities
ZDV.TO
PDC.TO
Industrials
ZDV.TO
PDC.TO
Communication Services
ZDV.TO
PDC.TO
Real Estate
ZDV.TO
PDC.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZDV.TO
PDC.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZDV.TO
PDC.TO
Healthcare
ZDV.TO
PDC.TO
-
Technology
ZDV.TO
-
PDC.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZDV.TO vs. PDC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZDV.TO
PDC.TO
ZDV.TO vs. PDC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO) and Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZDV.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.89 | 1.87 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.79 | 9.99 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.94 | 36.59 | +3.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZDV.TO vs. PDC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZDV.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.20%, roughly equal to the maximum PDC.TO drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZDV.TO and PDC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZDV.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.20% | -41.93% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.42% | -3.86% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.04% | -10.43% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.61% | -17.98% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.20% | -41.93% | -1.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -1.06% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -4.47% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 1.05% | +0.01% |
Volatility
ZDV.TO vs. PDC.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO) and Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) have volatilities of 2.75% and 2.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZDV.TO | PDC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 2.78% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.33% | 6.60% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.97% | 8.70% | +0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.61% | 10.85% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 15.28% | -0.34% |
ZDV.TO vs. PDC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZDV.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PDC.TO's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZDV.TO vs. PDC.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZDV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than PDC.TO's 3.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDC.TO Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF | 3.17% | 3.96% | 4.48% | 4.77% | 4.24% | 3.65% | 5.07% | 4.33% | 5.12% | 4.23% | 3.77% | 4.39% |
ZDV.TO BMO Canadian Dividend ETF | 2.63% | 3.07% | 3.82% | 4.39% | 4.38% | 3.88% | 4.79% | 4.53% | 5.28% | 4.04% | 4.31% | 4.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZDV.TO and PDC.TO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZDV.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZDV.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDC.TO.
ZDV.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while PDC.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZDV.TO and 0.58% for PDC.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZDV.TO and PDC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer