ZDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO
ZDV.TO (BMO Canadian Dividend ETF) and FCCD.TO (Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZDV.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by BMO, while FCCD.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the Fidelity Canada Canadian High Dividend Index. ZDV.TO is actively managed, while FCCD.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZDV.TO returned 13.72%/yr vs 12.03%/yr for FCCD.TO. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZDV.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FCCD.TO.
Performance
ZDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZDV.TO achieves a 18.56% return, which is significantly higher than FCCD.TO's 14.15% return.
ZDV.TO
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- 18.56%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 31.08%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
FCCD.TO
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 14.15%
- 6M
- 15.72%
- 1Y
- 32.15%
- 3Y*
- 19.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.03%
- 10Y*
- —
ZDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZDV.TO BMO Canadian Dividend ETF | 18.56% | 20.17% | 16.52% | 7.83% | -1.93% | 28.40% | -3.84% | 22.34% | -9.55% |
FCCD.TO Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF | 14.15% | 25.05% | 16.92% | 3.35% | -4.04% | 29.46% | -8.44% | 20.71% | -8.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZDV.TO and FCCD.TO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2018 | 0.87 |
The correlation between ZDV.TO and FCCD.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZDV.TO
FCCD.TO
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
ZDV.TO
FCCD.TO
Energy
ZDV.TO
FCCD.TO
Basic Materials
ZDV.TO
FCCD.TO
Utilities
ZDV.TO
FCCD.TO
Communication Services
ZDV.TO
FCCD.TO
Real Estate
ZDV.TO
FCCD.TO
Industrials
ZDV.TO
FCCD.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZDV.TO
FCCD.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZDV.TO
FCCD.TO
Healthcare
ZDV.TO
FCCD.TO
-
Technology
ZDV.TO
-
FCCD.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZDV.TO
FCCD.TO
ZDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO) and Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF (FCCD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZDV.TO | FCCD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.74 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | 5.70 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.24 | 27.08 | -8.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZDV.TO | FCCD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.95 | 3.87 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.26 | 1.05 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.62 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
ZDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZDV.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.21%, roughly equal to the maximum FCCD.TO drawdown of -43.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZDV.TO and FCCD.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZDV.TO | FCCD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.21% | -43.53% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.65% | -5.67% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.04% | -9.94% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.72% | -19.24% | +2.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.44% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.12% | -6.39% | +1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 1.19% | +0.52% |
Volatility
ZDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO) and Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF (FCCD.TO) have volatilities of 2.49% and 2.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZDV.TO | FCCD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.49% | 2.54% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.69% | 6.80% | +2.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.57% | 8.37% | +2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.94% | 11.52% | -0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.11% | 17.11% | -2.00% |
ZDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZDV.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FCCD.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZDV.TO vs. FCCD.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZDV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than FCCD.TO's 2.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCCD.TO Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF | 2.97% | 3.56% | 4.27% | 4.65% | 4.01% | 3.02% | 4.74% | 3.80% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZDV.TO BMO Canadian Dividend ETF | 2.68% | 3.07% | 3.57% | 4.10% | 4.10% | 3.63% | 4.48% | 4.11% | 5.06% | 3.96% | 3.84% | 4.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZDV.TO and FCCD.TO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCCD.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCCD.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZDV.TO.
ZDV.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while FCCD.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZDV.TO and 0.35% for FCCD.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZDV.TO and FCCD.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer