ZDI.TO vs. XDIV.TO
ZDI.TO (BMO International Dividend ETF) and XDIV.TO (iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZDI.TO is a International Equity fund actively managed by BMO, while XDIV.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. ZDI.TO is actively managed, while XDIV.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZDI.TO returned 12.30%/yr vs 17.21%/yr for XDIV.TO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZDI.TO charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for XDIV.TO.
Performance
ZDI.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZDI.TO achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV.TO's 21.85% return.
ZDI.TO
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 12.58%
- 6M
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 21.53%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 12.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.90%
XDIV.TO
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 21.85%
- 6M
- 20.22%
- 1Y
- 40.47%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- 17.21%
- 10Y*
- —
ZDI.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZDI.TO BMO International Dividend ETF | 12.58% | 19.42% | 10.59% | 17.04% | 0.31% | 12.86% | -6.23% | 13.00% | -6.86% | 0.79% |
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 21.85% | 25.04% | 19.84% | 11.95% | 0.49% | 33.31% | -7.53% | 25.14% | -9.81% | 8.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZDI.TO and XDIV.TO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017 | 0.57 |
The correlation between ZDI.TO and XDIV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ZDI.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZDI.TO
XDIV.TO
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
ZDI.TO
XDIV.TO
Industrials
ZDI.TO
XDIV.TO
-
Healthcare
ZDI.TO
XDIV.TO
-
Technology
ZDI.TO
XDIV.TO
Energy
ZDI.TO
XDIV.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZDI.TO
XDIV.TO
-
Communication Services
ZDI.TO
XDIV.TO
Utilities
ZDI.TO
XDIV.TO
Basic Materials
ZDI.TO
XDIV.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZDI.TO
XDIV.TO
Real Estate
ZDI.TO
XDIV.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZDI.TO vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZDI.TO
XDIV.TO
ZDI.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO International Dividend ETF (ZDI.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZDI.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 2.07 | -0.81 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 17.55 | -15.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.24 | 59.35 | -52.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZDI.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZDI.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, smaller than the maximum XDIV.TO drawdown of -41.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZDI.TO and XDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZDI.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.87% | -41.29% | +7.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.23% | -2.32% | -7.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.13% | -10.53% | -3.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.96% | -17.33% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | 0.00% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -4.39% | -0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 0.69% | +2.06% |
Volatility
ZDI.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO International Dividend ETF (ZDI.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) at 2.47%. This indicates that ZDI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZDI.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.18% | 2.47% | +2.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 6.45% | +5.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.09% | 7.95% | +6.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.26% | 10.51% | +2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 16.33% | -0.53% |
ZDI.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZDI.TO has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZDI.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZDI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than XDIV.TO's 3.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 3.25% | 3.90% | 4.50% | 4.42% | 4.15% | 3.76% | 4.85% | 4.24% | 5.13% | 1.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZDI.TO BMO International Dividend ETF | 3.04% | 3.41% | 3.94% | 4.15% | 3.99% | 3.72% | 4.96% | 4.92% | 5.23% | 4.23% | 4.62% | 4.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZDI.TO and XDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for ZDI.TO.
ZDI.TO is categorized as International Equity, while XDIV.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for ZDI.TO and 0.11% for XDIV.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZDI.TO and XDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer