PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZCS.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZCS.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCS.TO) and BMO AAA CLO ETF (ZAAA.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZCS.TO achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than ZAAA.NEO's 4.70% return.


ZCS.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.05%
6M
1.09%
YTD
1.53%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
2.80%

ZAAA.NEO

1D
0.03%
1M
0.70%
6M
3.32%
YTD
4.70%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCS.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ZCS.TO
BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.53%3.13%
ZAAA.NEO
BMO AAA CLO ETF
4.70%3.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ZCS.TO and ZAAA.NEO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZCS.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZCS.TO
ZCS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ZCS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ZAAA.NEO
ZAAA.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ZAAA.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAAA.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAAA.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAAA.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAAA.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZCS.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCS.TO) and BMO AAA CLO ETF (ZAAA.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZCS.TOZAAA.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.33

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.52

2.49

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.02

6.02

+4.00

ZCS.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZCS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the ZAAA.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZCS.TO and ZAAA.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZCS.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCS.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.95%, which is greater than ZAAA.NEO's maximum drawdown of -3.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCS.TO and ZAAA.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZCS.TOZAAA.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.95%

-3.01%

-10.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.63%

-3.01%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-1.11%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.89%

-1.00%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

1.24%

-0.83%

Volatility

ZCS.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCS.TO) is 0.56%, while BMO AAA CLO ETF (ZAAA.NEO) has a volatility of 1.50%. This indicates that ZCS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZAAA.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZCS.TOZAAA.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

1.50%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.80%

3.39%

-1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09%

4.59%

-2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.90%

4.64%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.38%

4.64%

-0.26%

ZCS.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCS.TO has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than ZAAA.NEO's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZCS.TO vs. ZAAA.NEO - Dividend Comparison

ZCS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than ZAAA.NEO's 5.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZAAA.NEO
BMO AAA CLO ETF
5.12%3.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZCS.TO
BMO Short Corporate Bond Index ETF
3.95%3.60%3.27%3.35%3.23%2.99%2.88%2.96%2.88%3.04%3.34%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZCS.TO and ZAAA.NEO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZCS.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZCS.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for ZAAA.NEO.

ZCS.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while ZAAA.NEO is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for ZCS.TO and 0.23% for ZAAA.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZCS.TO and ZAAA.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer