ZCOM.NEO vs. ZLB.TO
ZCOM.NEO (BMO Broad Commodity ETF (CAD Units)) and ZLB.TO (BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZCOM.NEO is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while ZLB.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by BMO. ZCOM.NEO is passively managed, while ZLB.TO is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. ZCOM.NEO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ZLB.TO.
Performance
ZCOM.NEO vs. ZLB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZCOM.NEO achieves a 28.30% return, which is significantly higher than ZLB.TO's 3.14% return.
ZCOM.NEO
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 28.30%
- 6M
- 27.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZLB.TO
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 4.82%
- 1Y
- 14.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
ZCOM.NEO vs. ZLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZCOM.NEO BMO Broad Commodity ETF (CAD Units) | 28.30% | 2.64% |
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 3.14% | 3.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZCOM.NEO and ZLB.TO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZCOM.NEO vs. ZLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZCOM.NEO
ZLB.TO
ZCOM.NEO vs. ZLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Broad Commodity ETF (CAD Units) (ZCOM.NEO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZCOM.NEO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.76 | 1.14 | +1.61 |
Drawdowns
ZCOM.NEO vs. ZLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCOM.NEO drawdown since its inception was -5.97%, smaller than the maximum ZLB.TO drawdown of -33.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCOM.NEO and ZLB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCOM.NEO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.97% | -33.96% | +27.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | -1.70% | -1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -2.46% | +0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.45% | — |
Volatility
ZCOM.NEO vs. ZLB.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZCOM.NEO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.06% | 8.29% | +12.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 9.44% | +11.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 12.15% | +8.91% |
ZCOM.NEO vs. ZLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZCOM.NEO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ZLB.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZCOM.NEO vs. ZLB.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZCOM.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than ZLB.TO's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZCOM.NEO BMO Broad Commodity ETF (CAD Units) | 5.74% | 2.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 1.88% | 1.93% | 2.37% | 2.67% | 2.66% | 2.39% | 2.83% | 2.44% | 2.76% | 2.52% | 2.94% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZCOM.NEO and ZLB.TO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZCOM.NEO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZCOM.NEO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZLB.TO.
ZCOM.NEO is categorized as Commodities, while ZLB.TO is Canada Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZCOM.NEO and 0.39% for ZLB.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZCOM.NEO and ZLB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer