ZCOM.NEO vs. CCOM.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZCOM.NEO (BMO Broad Commodity ETF (CAD Units)) and CCOM.TO (CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units) are both Commodities funds - ZCOM.NEO tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return while CCOM.TO tracks the Auspice Broad Commodity Excess Return Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZCOM.NEO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for CCOM.TO.

Performance

ZCOM.NEO vs. CCOM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Broad Commodity ETF (CAD Units) (ZCOM.NEO) and CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZCOM.NEO achieves a 28.30% return, which is significantly higher than CCOM.TO's 14.12% return.

ZCOM.NEO

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -1.07%
• YTD: 28.30%
• 6M: 27.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCOM.TO

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -1.57%
• YTD: 14.12%
• 6M: 13.88%
• 1Y: 21.03%
• 3Y*: 6.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCOM.NEO vs. CCOM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZCOM.NEO BMO Broad Commodity ETF (CAD Units)	28.30%	2.64%
CCOM.TO CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units	14.12%	1.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ZCOM.NEO and CCOM.TO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025	0.53

Return for Risk

ZCOM.NEO vs. CCOM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCOM.TO

CCOM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 70
CCOM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
CCOM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
CCOM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CCOM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CCOM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZCOM.NEO vs. CCOM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Broad Commodity ETF (CAD Units) (ZCOM.NEO) and CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZCOM.NEO	CCOM.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.76	0.82	+1.93

Drawdowns

ZCOM.NEO vs. CCOM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCOM.NEO drawdown since its inception was -5.97%, smaller than the maximum CCOM.TO drawdown of -9.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCOM.NEO and CCOM.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZCOM.NEO	CCOM.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.97%	-9.79%	+3.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.45%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.96%	-4.45%	+1.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.72%	-2.96%	+1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.48%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZCOM.NEO	CCOM.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.71%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.36%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.06%	10.02%	+11.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.06%	8.42%	+12.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.06%	8.42%	+12.64%

ZCOM.NEO vs. CCOM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCOM.NEO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOM.TO's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZCOM.NEO vs. CCOM.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZCOM.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, less than CCOM.TO's 7.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CCOM.TO CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units	7.35%	3.48%	6.99%	4.21%
ZCOM.NEO BMO Broad Commodity ETF (CAD Units)	5.74%	2.09%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZCOM.NEO and CCOM.TO in my portfolio?

ZCOM.NEO and CCOM.TO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZCOM.NEO or CCOM.TO?

On fees, ZCOM.NEO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZCOM.NEO or CCOM.TO?

ZCOM.NEO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for CCOM.TO.

What is the main difference between ZCOM.NEO and CCOM.TO?

ZCOM.NEO tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while CCOM.TO tracks Auspice Broad Commodity Excess Return Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and CI. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZCOM.NEO and 0.73% for CCOM.TO.