ZCOM.NEO vs. REIT.TO
ZCOM.NEO (BMO Broad Commodity ETF (CAD Units)) and REIT.TO (Global X Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZCOM.NEO is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while REIT.TO is a REIT fund tracking the Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
ZCOM.NEO vs. REIT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZCOM.NEO achieves a 23.18% return, which is significantly higher than REIT.TO's 15.37% return.
ZCOM.NEO
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 17.01%
- YTD
- 23.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REIT.TO
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- YTD
- 15.37%
- 1Y
- 17.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCOM.NEO vs. REIT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZCOM.NEO BMO Broad Commodity ETF (CAD Units) | 23.18% | 1.56% |
REIT.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index ETF | 15.37% | 1.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZCOM.NEO and REIT.TO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZCOM.NEO vs. REIT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZCOM.NEO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
REIT.TO
ZCOM.NEO vs. REIT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Broad Commodity ETF (CAD Units) (ZCOM.NEO) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index ETF (REIT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZCOM.NEO | REIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.39 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.06 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZCOM.NEO vs. REIT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCOM.NEO drawdown since its inception was -11.54%, which is greater than REIT.TO's maximum drawdown of -7.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCOM.NEO and REIT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCOM.NEO | REIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.54% | -7.19% | -4.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.83% | -0.65% | -6.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -1.57% | -1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.43% | — |
Volatility
ZCOM.NEO vs. REIT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZCOM.NEO | REIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.02% | 12.65% | +9.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 12.78% | +9.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 12.78% | +9.24% |
Dividends
ZCOM.NEO vs. REIT.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZCOM.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.98%, more than REIT.TO's 4.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
REIT.TO Global X Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index ETF | 4.23% | 3.20% |
ZCOM.NEO BMO Broad Commodity ETF (CAD Units) | 5.98% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZCOM.NEO and REIT.TO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZCOM.NEO is categorized as Commodities, while REIT.TO is REIT. ZCOM.NEO tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while REIT.TO tracks Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian REITs Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Global X.
Find the right allocation for ZCOM.NEO and REIT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer