ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO
ZCN.TO (BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF) and ZEA.TO (BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZCN.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index, while ZEA.TO is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZCN.TO returned 12.59%/yr vs 10.27%/yr for ZEA.TO. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZCN.TO charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for ZEA.TO.
Performance
ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ZCN.TO having a 12.95% return and ZEA.TO slightly higher at 13.25%. Over the past 10 years, ZCN.TO has outperformed ZEA.TO with an annualized return of 12.59%, while ZEA.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.27% annualized return.
ZCN.TO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 8.79%
- YTD
- 12.95%
- 1Y
- 33.83%
- 3Y*
- 23.78%
- 5Y*
- 15.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
ZEA.TO
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 8.17%
- YTD
- 13.25%
- 1Y
- 25.13%
- 3Y*
- 17.97%
- 5Y*
- 11.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZCN.TO BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 12.95% | 31.51% | 21.64% | 11.63% | -5.84% | 25.05% | 5.69% | 22.85% | -8.85% | 8.98% |
ZEA.TO BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF | 13.25% | 24.92% | 11.58% | 16.04% | -8.50% | 10.66% | 5.15% | 16.72% | -6.23% | 16.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZCN.TO and ZEA.TO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2014 | 0.61 |
The correlation between ZCN.TO and ZEA.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZCN.TO
ZEA.TO
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Financial Services
ZCN.TO
ZEA.TO
Energy
ZCN.TO
ZEA.TO
Basic Materials
ZCN.TO
ZEA.TO
Industrials
ZCN.TO
ZEA.TO
Technology
ZCN.TO
ZEA.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZCN.TO
ZEA.TO
Utilities
ZCN.TO
ZEA.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZCN.TO
ZEA.TO
Communication Services
ZCN.TO
ZEA.TO
Real Estate
ZCN.TO
ZEA.TO
Healthcare
ZCN.TO
ZEA.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZCN.TO
ZEA.TO
ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO) and BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZCN.TO | ZEA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.32 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 2.31 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.63 | 8.87 | +7.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCN.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.18%, which is greater than ZEA.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCN.TO and ZEA.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCN.TO | ZEA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.18% | -27.80% | -9.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | -10.91% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.25% | -14.11% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.25% | -23.66% | +7.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.18% | -27.80% | -9.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.93% | +1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.71% | -4.59% | -0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.84% | -0.80% |
Volatility
ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO) is 2.20%, while BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that ZCN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZCN.TO | ZEA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | 3.48% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.64% | 12.52% | -1.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.14% | 14.61% | -1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.18% | 13.66% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.98% | 14.71% | +0.27% |
ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZCN.TO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than ZEA.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZCN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than ZEA.TO's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZCN.TO BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF | 2.03% | 2.22% | 2.78% | 3.29% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.24% | 3.13% | 3.16% | 2.75% | 2.86% | 3.36% |
ZEA.TO BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF | 1.91% | 2.17% | 2.78% | 3.02% | 3.08% | 2.49% | 2.74% | 2.95% | 3.05% | 2.40% | 2.80% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZCN.TO and ZEA.TO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZCN.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for ZEA.TO.
ZCN.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while ZEA.TO is Foreign Large Cap Equities. ZCN.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index, while ZEA.TO tracks MSCI EAFE Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ZCN.TO and 0.22% for ZEA.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZCN.TO and ZEA.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer