PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO) and BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ZCN.TO having a 12.95% return and ZEA.TO slightly higher at 13.25%. Over the past 10 years, ZCN.TO has outperformed ZEA.TO with an annualized return of 12.59%, while ZEA.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.27% annualized return.


ZCN.TO

1D
0.25%
1M
0.63%
6M
8.79%
YTD
12.95%
1Y
33.83%
3Y*
23.78%
5Y*
15.34%
10Y*
12.59%

ZEA.TO

1D
0.48%
1M
0.92%
6M
8.17%
YTD
13.25%
1Y
25.13%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
10.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZCN.TO
BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
12.95%31.51%21.64%11.63%-5.84%25.05%5.69%22.85%-8.85%8.98%
ZEA.TO
BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF
13.25%24.92%11.58%16.04%-8.50%10.66%5.15%16.72%-6.23%16.78%

Correlation

The correlation between ZCN.TO and ZEA.TO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2014

0.61

The correlation between ZCN.TO and ZEA.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZCN.TO
ZEA.TO

Financial Services

36.2%
27.3%

Energy

16.3%
3.2%

Basic Materials

15.9%
5.8%

Industrials

10.5%
18.2%

Technology

7.2%
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
7.0%

Utilities

3.6%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
6.4%

Communication Services

1.7%
3.3%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.5%

Healthcare

0.2%
10.2%

Financial Services

ZCN.TO
36.2%
ZEA.TO
27.3%

Energy

ZCN.TO
16.3%
ZEA.TO
3.2%

Basic Materials

ZCN.TO
15.9%
ZEA.TO
5.8%

Industrials

ZCN.TO
10.5%
ZEA.TO
18.2%

Technology

ZCN.TO
7.2%
ZEA.TO
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ZCN.TO
3.9%
ZEA.TO
7.0%

Utilities

ZCN.TO
3.6%
ZEA.TO
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

ZCN.TO
2.9%
ZEA.TO
6.4%

Communication Services

ZCN.TO
1.7%
ZEA.TO
3.3%

Real Estate

ZCN.TO
1.5%
ZEA.TO
1.5%

Healthcare

ZCN.TO
0.2%
ZEA.TO
10.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZCN.TO
ZCN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ZCN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

ZEA.TO
ZEA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ZEA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO) and BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZCN.TOZEA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.32

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

2.31

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.63

8.87

+7.76

ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZCN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the ZEA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZCN.TO and ZEA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCN.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.18%, which is greater than ZEA.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCN.TO and ZEA.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZCN.TOZEA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.18%

-27.80%

-9.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-10.91%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.25%

-14.11%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.25%

-23.66%

+7.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.18%

-27.80%

-9.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.93%

+1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-4.59%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

2.84%

-0.80%

Volatility

ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN.TO) is 2.20%, while BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that ZCN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZCN.TOZEA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

3.48%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

12.52%

-1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.14%

14.61%

-1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.18%

13.66%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.98%

14.71%

+0.27%

ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCN.TO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than ZEA.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZCN.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZCN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than ZEA.TO's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZCN.TO
BMO S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF
2.03%2.22%2.78%3.29%3.27%2.74%3.24%3.13%3.16%2.75%2.86%3.36%
ZEA.TO
BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF
1.91%2.17%2.78%3.02%3.08%2.49%2.74%2.95%3.05%2.40%2.80%2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZCN.TO and ZEA.TO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZCN.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZCN.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for ZEA.TO.

ZCN.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while ZEA.TO is Foreign Large Cap Equities. ZCN.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index, while ZEA.TO tracks MSCI EAFE Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ZCN.TO and 0.22% for ZEA.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZCN.TO and ZEA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer