PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZCM.TO vs. ZIN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZCM.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCM.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZCM.TO achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly lower than ZIN.TO's 22.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ZCM.TO has underperformed ZIN.TO with an annualized return of 3.01%, while ZIN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.42% annualized return.


ZCM.TO

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.85%
YTD
1.96%
6M
1.40%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
6.78%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
3.01%

ZIN.TO

1D
-0.12%
1M
4.65%
YTD
22.77%
6M
26.17%
1Y
43.28%
3Y*
20.97%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*
13.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCM.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZCM.TO
BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.96%4.84%8.07%7.96%-10.18%-2.09%10.34%8.59%0.58%2.28%
ZIN.TO
BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF
22.77%16.68%16.33%19.36%-8.06%17.86%6.62%22.67%-6.61%17.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ZCM.TO and ZIN.TO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2012

0.00

The correlation between ZCM.TO and ZIN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZCM.TO vs. ZIN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZCM.TO
ZCM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ZCM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

ZIN.TO
ZIN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ZIN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZIN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZIN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ZIN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZIN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZCM.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCM.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZCM.TOZIN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.52

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

5.37

-3.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.77

19.31

-14.55

ZCM.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZCM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the ZIN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZCM.TO and ZIN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZCM.TOZIN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14

2.97

-1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.82

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.75

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.76

-0.20

Drawdowns

ZCM.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCM.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.06%, smaller than the maximum ZIN.TO drawdown of -44.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCM.TO and ZIN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZCM.TOZIN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.06%

-44.01%

+17.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-8.10%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.02%

-22.39%

+18.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.82%

-23.11%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.06%

-44.01%

+17.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.12%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.61%

-6.14%

+3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.08%

2.25%

-1.17%

Volatility

ZCM.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCM.TO) is 1.81%, while BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN.TO) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that ZCM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZIN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZCM.TOZIN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

3.38%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.65%

11.39%

-7.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.51%

14.67%

-10.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.09%

16.70%

-10.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.76%

18.04%

-9.28%

ZCM.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCM.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than ZIN.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZCM.TO vs. ZIN.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZCM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than ZIN.TO's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZCM.TO
BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF
4.25%4.03%3.84%3.93%3.80%3.29%3.12%3.33%3.22%3.04%3.18%3.42%
ZIN.TO
BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF
0.95%1.22%1.41%1.67%2.01%1.84%2.10%2.31%1.81%1.35%1.91%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZCM.TO and ZIN.TO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZCM.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZCM.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZIN.TO.

ZCM.TO is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ZIN.TO is Industrials Equities. ZCM.TO tracks FTSE Canada Mid Term Corporate Bond Index, while ZIN.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for ZCM.TO and 0.61% for ZIN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZCM.TO and ZIN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer