ZCBF vs. SPTB
ZCBF (Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2034 ETF) and SPTB (State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - ZCBF tracks the FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2034 Maturity Index while SPTB tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ZCBF charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTB.
Performance
ZCBF vs. SPTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZCBF
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTB
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 3.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCBF vs. SPTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZCBF Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2034 ETF | -1.01% |
SPTB State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF | -0.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZCBF and SPTB is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZCBF vs. SPTB — Risk / Return Rank
ZCBF
SPTB
ZCBF vs. SPTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2034 ETF (ZCBF) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZCBF | SPTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 0.89 | -1.32 |
Drawdowns
ZCBF vs. SPTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCBF drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum SPTB drawdown of -4.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCBF and SPTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCBF | SPTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -4.96% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.67% | -2.15% | -1.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -1.32% | -0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.99% | — |
Volatility
ZCBF vs. SPTB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZCBF | SPTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.78% | 3.61% | +2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 4.41% | +1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 4.41% | +1.37% |
ZCBF vs. SPTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZCBF has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZCBF vs. SPTB - Dividend Comparison
ZCBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than SPTB's 4.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SPTB State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF | 4.21% | 4.23% | 2.76% |
ZCBF Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2034 ETF | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, ZCBF and SPTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPTB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for ZCBF.
SPTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 1.70% for ZCBF.
ZCBF tracks FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2034 Maturity Index, while SPTB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZCBF and 0.03% for SPTB.
Find the right allocation for ZCBF and SPTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer