PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZCBF vs. SPTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZCBF vs. SPTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2034 ETF (ZCBF) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ZCBF

1D
-0.59%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPTB

1D
-0.32%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
-0.28%
6M
-0.14%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCBF vs. SPTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZCBF and SPTB is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026

0.98

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZCBF vs. SPTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZCBF

SPTB
SPTB Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SPTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTB Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTB Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZCBF vs. SPTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2034 ETF (ZCBF) and State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF (SPTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ZCBF vs. SPTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZCBFSPTBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

0.89

-1.32

Drawdowns

ZCBF vs. SPTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCBF drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum SPTB drawdown of -4.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCBF and SPTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZCBFSPTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-4.96%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.67%

-2.15%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-1.32%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

Volatility

ZCBF vs. SPTB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZCBFSPTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.78%

3.61%

+2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.78%

4.41%

+1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.78%

4.41%

+1.37%

ZCBF vs. SPTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCBF has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZCBF vs. SPTB - Dividend Comparison

ZCBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than SPTB's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
SPTB
State Street SPDR Portfolio Treasury ETF
4.21%4.23%2.76%
ZCBF
Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2034 ETF
1.70%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, ZCBF and SPTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPTB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPTB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for ZCBF.

SPTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 1.70% for ZCBF.

ZCBF tracks FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2034 Maturity Index, while SPTB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZCBF and 0.03% for SPTB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZCBF and SPTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer