ZCBE vs. SPTL
ZCBE (Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF) and SPTL (SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - ZCBE tracks the FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2033 Maturity Index while SPTL tracks the Bloomberg Long U.S. Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZCBE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTL.
Performance
ZCBE vs. SPTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZCBE
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTL
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- -0.73%
- 6M
- -1.09%
- 1Y
- 3.32%
- 3Y*
- -0.93%
- 5Y*
- -5.38%
- 10Y*
- -1.12%
ZCBE vs. SPTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZCBE Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF | -0.89% |
SPTL SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF | -1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZCBE and SPTL is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZCBE vs. SPTL — Risk / Return Rank
ZCBE
SPTL
ZCBE vs. SPTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF (ZCBE) and SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF (SPTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZCBE | SPTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 0.24 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
ZCBE vs. SPTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCBE drawdown since its inception was -4.24%, smaller than the maximum SPTL drawdown of -46.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCBE and SPTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCBE | SPTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -46.20% | +41.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.47% | -37.09% | +33.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.69% | -14.25% | +12.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.72% | — |
Volatility
ZCBE vs. SPTL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZCBE | SPTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.24% | 8.82% | -3.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.24% | 14.61% | -9.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.24% | 13.94% | -8.70% |
ZCBE vs. SPTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZCBE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTL's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZCBE vs. SPTL - Dividend Comparison
ZCBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than SPTL's 4.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPTL SPDR Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.03% | 3.24% | 2.75% | 1.68% | 1.71% | 2.45% | 2.69% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 2.60% |
ZCBE Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZCBE and SPTL have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPTL is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPTL is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for ZCBE.
SPTL has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 1.66% for ZCBE.
ZCBE tracks FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2033 Maturity Index, while SPTL tracks Bloomberg Long U.S. Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZCBE and 0.03% for SPTL.
Find the right allocation for ZCBE and SPTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer