PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZAUG vs. KSEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZAUG vs. KSEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August (ZAUG) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZAUG achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly lower than KSEP's 8.77% return.


ZAUG

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.72%
YTD
2.70%
6M
3.10%
1Y
8.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KSEP

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.76%
YTD
8.77%
6M
8.72%
1Y
20.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZAUG vs. KSEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZAUG and KSEP is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024

0.69

The correlation between ZAUG and KSEP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZAUG vs. KSEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZAUG
ZAUG Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

KSEP
KSEP Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
KSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
KSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZAUG vs. KSEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August (ZAUG) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZAUGKSEPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.37

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.71

4.36

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.32

15.77

+11.55

ZAUG vs. KSEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZAUG Sharpe Ratio is 3.31, which is higher than the KSEP Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZAUG and KSEP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZAUGKSEPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.31

2.04

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.66

1.03

+0.63

Drawdowns

ZAUG vs. KSEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZAUG drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum KSEP drawdown of -14.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAUG and KSEP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZAUGKSEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-14.92%

+10.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.72%

-4.75%

+3.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.28%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.41%

-2.45%

+2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

1.31%

-1.01%

Volatility

ZAUG vs. KSEP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August (ZAUG) is 0.29%, while Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP) has a volatility of 1.63%. This indicates that ZAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KSEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZAUGKSEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.29%

1.63%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.81%

6.27%

-4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47%

10.16%

-7.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.58%

11.65%

-7.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.58%

11.65%

-7.07%

ZAUG vs. KSEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZAUG and KSEP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

ZAUG vs. KSEP - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZAUG nor KSEP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZAUG and KSEP have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KSEP has higher volatility (1.63%) compared to ZAUG (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZAUG dropped -4.83% vs KSEP's -14.92%.

On 1-year performance, KSEP leads with 20.63% vs 8.08% for ZAUG. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, ZAUG has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KSEP has performed better with a 20.63% return vs 8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZAUG and KSEP have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

ZAUG and KSEP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

ZAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZAUG and KSEP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer