ZAUG vs. JANB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZAUG (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August) and JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZAUG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JANB.

Performance

ZAUG vs. JANB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August (ZAUG) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZAUG achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly lower than JANB's 6.08% return.

ZAUG

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 6M: 3.10%
• 1Y: 8.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JANB

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 2.38%
• YTD: 6.08%
• 6M: 7.10%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZAUG vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZAUG Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August	2.70%	1.06%
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF	6.08%	2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ZAUG and JANB is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

ZAUG vs. JANB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZAUG

ZAUG Risk / Return Rank: 92
ZAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
ZAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
ZAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 95
ZAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
ZAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZAUG vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August (ZAUG) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZAUG	JANB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.31	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.30	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.73	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.71	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	27.32	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZAUG	JANB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.66	1.97	-0.31

Drawdowns

ZAUG vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZAUG drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum JANB drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAUG and JANB.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZAUG	JANB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.83%	-6.52%	+1.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-0.22%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.41%	-1.14%	+0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZAUG	JANB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.29%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.81%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47%	7.41%	-4.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.58%	7.41%	-2.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.58%	7.41%	-2.83%

ZAUG vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZAUG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZAUG vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZAUG nor JANB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZAUG and JANB in my portfolio?

ZAUG and JANB have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZAUG or JANB?

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZAUG or JANB?

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZAUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZAUG or JANB?

ZAUG and JANB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ZAUG and JANB?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZAUG and 0.25% for JANB.