ZAPR vs. JANB
ZAPR (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April) and JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JANB.
Performance
ZAPR vs. JANB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZAPR achieves a 3.25% return, which is significantly lower than JANB's 6.08% return.
ZAPR
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 3.25%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JANB
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- 6.08%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZAPR vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZAPR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April | 3.25% | 1.22% |
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF | 6.08% | 2.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZAPR and JANB is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZAPR vs. JANB — Risk / Return Rank
ZAPR
JANB
ZAPR vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZAPR | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.93 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 9.13 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.30 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.93 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 92.53 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZAPR | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.96 | 1.97 | +1.00 |
Drawdowns
ZAPR vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZAPR drawdown since its inception was -1.72%, smaller than the maximum JANB drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAPR and JANB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZAPR | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -6.52% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -0.22% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -1.14% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | — | — |
Volatility
ZAPR vs. JANB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZAPR | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46% | 7.41% | -5.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.51% | 7.41% | -4.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.51% | 7.41% | -4.90% |
ZAPR vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZAPR vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZAPR nor JANB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZAPR and JANB have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZAPR.
ZAPR and JANB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZAPR and 0.25% for JANB.
Find the right allocation for ZAPR and JANB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer