ZAP vs. PSCU
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU).
ZAP and PSCU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZAP is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Global X U.S. Electrification Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2024. PSCU is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Capped Utilities & Communication Services Index. It was launched on Apr 7, 2010. Both ZAP and PSCU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ZAP vs. PSCU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZAP vs. PSCU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZAP Global X U.S. Electrification ETF | 11.63% | 21.84% | 1.26% |
PSCU Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF | 4.93% | -1.93% | 0.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZAP achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly higher than PSCU's 4.93% return.
ZAP
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -2.67%
- YTD
- 11.63%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 33.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCU
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- YTD
- 4.93%
- 6M
- 5.84%
- 1Y
- 6.67%
- 3Y*
- 3.78%
- 5Y*
- 0.79%
- 10Y*
- 5.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZAP vs. PSCU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZAP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCU's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZAP vs. PSCU — Risk / Return Rank
ZAP
PSCU
ZAP vs. PSCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZAP | PSCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 0.40 | +1.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.74 | 0.70 | +2.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.08 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 0.68 | +3.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.89 | 1.94 | +9.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZAP | PSCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 0.40 | +1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.74 | 0.46 | +1.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZAP and PSCU is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ZAP vs. PSCU - Dividend Comparison
ZAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than PSCU's 1.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZAP Global X U.S. Electrification ETF | 1.62% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCU Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF | 1.06% | 1.10% | 0.98% | 1.60% | 1.71% | 2.69% | 1.20% | 2.47% | 2.35% | 1.84% | 6.93% | 2.94% |
Drawdowns
ZAP vs. PSCU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZAP drawdown since its inception was -12.38%, smaller than the maximum PSCU drawdown of -29.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAP and PSCU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZAP | PSCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.38% | -29.97% | +17.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.59% | -11.27% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -8.79% | +5.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.67% | -7.72% | +5.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 3.96% | -1.08% |
Volatility
ZAP vs. PSCU - Volatility Comparison
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Utilities & Communication Services ETF (PSCU) have volatilities of 5.34% and 5.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZAP | PSCU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 5.20% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.77% | 11.36% | -0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.07% | 17.88% | -1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 18.32% | -1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 19.45% | -2.91% |