ZAP vs. FXU
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) and First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU).
ZAP and FXU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZAP is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Global X U.S. Electrification Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2024. FXU is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the StrataQuant Utilities Index. It was launched on May 8, 2007. Both ZAP and FXU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ZAP vs. FXU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZAP vs. FXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZAP Global X U.S. Electrification ETF | 10.67% | 21.84% | 1.26% |
FXU First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund | 10.69% | 21.86% | 1.82% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ZAP having a 10.67% return and FXU slightly higher at 10.69%.
ZAP
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- 33.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXU
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -2.31%
- YTD
- 10.69%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 23.77%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZAP vs. FXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZAP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FXU's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZAP vs. FXU — Risk / Return Rank
ZAP
FXU
ZAP vs. FXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) and First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZAP | FXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.07 | 1.59 | +0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.71 | 2.10 | +0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.30 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 2.87 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.91 | 9.49 | +2.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZAP | FXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 1.59 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.69 | 0.43 | +1.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZAP and FXU is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ZAP vs. FXU - Dividend Comparison
ZAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than FXU's 2.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZAP Global X U.S. Electrification ETF | 1.64% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXU First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund | 2.11% | 2.29% | 2.41% | 2.52% | 2.03% | 2.00% | 3.97% | 2.34% | 2.40% | 3.81% | 2.62% | 3.90% |
Drawdowns
ZAP vs. FXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZAP drawdown since its inception was -12.38%, smaller than the maximum FXU drawdown of -49.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAP and FXU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZAP | FXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.38% | -49.00% | +36.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.59% | -8.57% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.71% | -2.31% | -1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.67% | -7.67% | +5.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 2.59% | +0.29% |
Volatility
ZAP vs. FXU - Volatility Comparison
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) at 4.52%. This indicates that ZAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZAP | FXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 4.52% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.77% | 9.08% | +1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.07% | 14.98% | +1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 16.48% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 18.29% | -1.74% |