PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZAP vs. BILT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZAP vs. BILT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZAP achieves a 15.14% return, which is significantly higher than BILT's 12.39% return.


ZAP

1D
-0.63%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
15.14%
6M
13.19%
1Y
28.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BILT

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.24%
YTD
12.39%
6M
11.87%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZAP vs. BILT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZAP and BILT is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025

0.64

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZAP vs. BILT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZAP
ZAP Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ZAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAP Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BILT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZAP vs. BILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZAPBILTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.25

ZAP vs. BILT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZAPBILTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.63

2.00

-0.36

Drawdowns

ZAP vs. BILT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZAP drawdown since its inception was -12.38%, which is greater than BILT's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAP and BILT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZAPBILTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.38%

-5.38%

-7.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.11%

-2.36%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-1.44%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

Volatility

ZAP vs. BILT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZAPBILTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.13%

10.28%

+4.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

10.28%

+6.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.91%

10.28%

+6.63%

ZAP vs. BILT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZAP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BILT's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZAP vs. BILT - Dividend Comparison

ZAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than BILT's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BILT
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF
1.33%0.99%0.00%
ZAP
Global X U.S. Electrification ETF
1.55%1.81%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZAP and BILT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BILT.

ZAP has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 1.33% for BILT.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ZAP and 0.60% for BILT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZAP and BILT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer