YYYY.DE vs. UIQ4.DE
YYYY.DE (YieldMax Big Tech Option Income UCITS ETF) and UIQ4.DE (UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both Derivative Income funds. YYYY.DE is actively managed, while UIQ4.DE is passively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YYYY.DE charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for UIQ4.DE.
Performance
YYYY.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YYYY.DE achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly higher than UIQ4.DE's 3.01% return.
YYYY.DE
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 4.27%
- 1Y
- 12.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UIQ4.DE
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 3.01%
- 6M
- 3.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YYYY.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YYYY.DE YieldMax Big Tech Option Income UCITS ETF | 7.15% | 4.40% |
UIQ4.DE UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 3.01% | 6.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between YYYY.DE and UIQ4.DE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YYYY.DE vs. UIQ4.DE — Risk / Return Rank
YYYY.DE
UIQ4.DE
YYYY.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Big Tech Option Income UCITS ETF (YYYY.DE) and UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc (UIQ4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YYYY.DE | UIQ4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YYYY.DE | UIQ4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 1.27 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
YYYY.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YYYY.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, which is greater than UIQ4.DE's maximum drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YYYY.DE and UIQ4.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YYYY.DE | UIQ4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.48% | -3.90% | -16.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.06% | -0.25% | -1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.54% | -0.87% | -5.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.23% | — | — |
Volatility
YYYY.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YYYY.DE | UIQ4.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.44% | 7.67% | +10.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.99% | 7.67% | +14.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.99% | 7.67% | +14.32% |
YYYY.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
YYYY.DE has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than UIQ4.DE's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
YYYY.DE vs. UIQ4.DE - Dividend Comparison
YYYY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.86%, while UIQ4.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
UIQ4.DE UBS Euro Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YYYY.DE YieldMax Big Tech Option Income UCITS ETF | 24.86% | 17.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YYYY.DE and UIQ4.DE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UIQ4.DE is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIQ4.DE is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for YYYY.DE.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for YYYY.DE and 0.21% for UIQ4.DE.
Find the right allocation for YYYY.DE and UIQ4.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer