PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YYY vs. CAOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YYY vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YYY achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.76% return.


YYY

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.29%
6M
2.97%
YTD
5.30%
1Y
9.88%
3Y*
11.24%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*
5.27%
ALL TIME*
5.92%

CAOS

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.01%
6M
0.16%
YTD
0.76%
1Y
1.73%
3Y*
3.48%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.81M$5.39M$5.09M
$3.24M$3.27M$4.35M

YYY vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
YYY
Amplify CEF High Income ETF
5.30%13.08%11.86%5.57%
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.76%2.55%5.33%7.43%

Correlation

The correlation between YYY and CAOS is -0.28, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2023

-0.01

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between YYY and CAOS has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.28, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YYY vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YYY
YYY Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
YYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
YYY Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
YYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
YYY Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

CAOS
CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YYY vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YYYCAOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

2.47

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.14

5.45

-0.31

YYY vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YYY Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YYY and CAOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YYY vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YYY drawdown since its inception was -42.52%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YYY and CAOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YYYCAOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.52%

-3.89%

-38.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

-0.76%

-7.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.47%

-3.60%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-1.13%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-0.92%

-5.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

0.34%

+1.55%

Volatility

YYY vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

Amplify CEF High Income ETF (YYY) has a higher volatility of 2.00% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.51%. This indicates that YYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YYYCAOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

0.51%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.33%

1.07%

+6.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.77%

1.57%

+7.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.35%

4.18%

+7.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.87%

4.18%

+9.69%

YYY vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

YYY has a 3.23% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

YYY vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

YYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.79%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YYY
Amplify CEF High Income ETF
12.79%12.51%12.50%12.39%12.36%9.08%9.79%9.10%9.73%8.16%10.34%10.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


YYY and CAOS have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YYY has higher volatility (2.00%) compared to CAOS (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YYY dropped -42.52% vs CAOS's -3.89%.

On 3-year performance, YYY leads with 11.24% vs 3.48% for CAOS. On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, YYY has performed better with a 11.24% return vs 3.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 3.23% for YYY.

YYY has the higher dividend yield at 12.79%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

YYY is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 3.23% for YYY and 0.63% for CAOS.

CAOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YYY and CAOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer