YXI vs. EOCT
YXI (ProShares Short FTSE China 50) and EOCT (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - YXI is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%), while EOCT is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. YXI is passively managed, while EOCT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, YXI returned -10.31%/yr vs 12.92%/yr for EOCT. Their -0.76 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. YXI charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EOCT.
Performance
YXI vs. EOCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YXI achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly lower than EOCT's 9.00% return.
YXI
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -12.38%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- YTD
- 5.63%
- 1Y
- 4.09%
- 3Y*
- -10.31%
- 5Y*
- -5.27%
- 10Y*
- -7.71%
- ALL TIME*
- -8.22%
EOCT
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 1Y
- 21.52%
- 3Y*
- 12.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $211.18K | $179.87K | $289.70K | |
| $23.14K | $29.95K | $34.52K |
YXI vs. EOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 5.63% | -22.87% | -25.36% | 12.40% | 4.78% | 2.98% |
EOCT Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October | 9.00% | 22.03% | 9.66% | 6.26% | -10.75% | -0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between YXI and EOCT is -0.55, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | -0.76 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between YXI and EOCT has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.76 to -0.55, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YXI vs. EOCT — Risk / Return Rank
YXI
EOCT
YXI vs. EOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YXI | EOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.45 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 3.65 | -3.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.77 | 14.65 | -13.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YXI vs. EOCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YXI drawdown since its inception was -81.15%, which is greater than EOCT's maximum drawdown of -20.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YXI and EOCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YXI | EOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.15% | -20.35% | -60.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.55% | -5.93% | -7.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.12% | -8.54% | -44.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.43% | 0.00% | -78.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.52% | -5.52% | -49.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.32% | 1.47% | +3.85% |
Volatility
YXI vs. EOCT - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) has a higher volatility of 6.80% compared to Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October (EOCT) at 2.69%. This indicates that YXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YXI | EOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.80% | 2.69% | +4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.85% | 7.35% | +8.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.09% | 9.21% | +11.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.28% | 11.25% | +20.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.48% | 11.25% | +16.23% |
YXI vs. EOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
YXI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EOCT's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
YXI vs. EOCT - Dividend Comparison
YXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, while EOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EOCT Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 2.69% | 3.60% | 4.35% | 2.66% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.01% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YXI and EOCT have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YXI has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to EOCT (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YXI dropped -81.15% vs EOCT's -20.35%.
On 3-year performance, EOCT leads with 12.92% vs -10.31% for YXI. On fees, EOCT is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, EOCT has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, EOCT has performed better with a 12.92% return vs -10.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EOCT is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YXI.
YXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.00% for EOCT.
YXI is categorized as China Equities, while EOCT is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YXI and 0.89% for EOCT.
EOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YXI and EOCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer