YXI vs. CGRO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

YXI (ProShares Short FTSE China 50) and CGRO (CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YXI is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%), while CGRO is a China Equities fund actively managed by CoreValues Alpha. YXI is passively managed, while CGRO is actively managed. Over the past year, YXI returned 13.74% vs -20.81% for CGRO. At a correlation of -0.87, they often move in opposite directions. YXI charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CGRO.

Performance

YXI vs. CGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) and CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YXI achieves a 18.26% return, which is significantly higher than CGRO's -23.93% return.

YXI

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: 9.19%
• YTD: 18.26%
• 6M: 18.90%
• 1Y: 13.74%
• 3Y*: -9.65%
• 5Y*: -0.64%
• 10Y*: -7.62%

CGRO

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -11.31%
• YTD: -23.93%
• 6M: -24.48%
• 1Y: -20.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YXI vs. CGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50	18.26%	-22.87%	-25.36%	8.21%
CGRO CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF	-23.93%	20.23%	14.75%	1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between YXI and CGRO is -0.81, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2023	-0.87

The correlation between YXI and CGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.87 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

YXI vs. CGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YXI

YXI Risk / Return Rank: 21
YXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
YXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
YXI Omega Ratio Rank: 20
YXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
YXI Martin Ratio Rank: 20

CGRO

CGRO Risk / Return Rank: 3
CGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YXI vs. CGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) and CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YXI	CGRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.69	-0.94	+1.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.10	-1.28	+2.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	0.86	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	-0.60	+1.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.14	-1.28	+3.42

YXI vs. CGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YXI Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the CGRO Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YXI and CGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YXI vs. CGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YXI drawdown since its inception was -81.15%, which is greater than CGRO's maximum drawdown of -34.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YXI and CGRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	YXI	CGRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.15%	-34.99%	-46.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.48%	-34.99%	+22.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-75.85%	-34.99%	-40.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.37%	-10.65%	-43.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.43%	16.33%	-9.90%

Volatility

YXI vs. CGRO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) at 6.31%. This indicates that YXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YXI	CGRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.72%	6.31%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.53%	15.97%	-0.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.14%	22.41%	-2.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.48%	28.84%	+2.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.43%	28.84%	-1.41%

YXI vs. CGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

YXI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CGRO's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

YXI vs. CGRO - Dividend Comparison

YXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than CGRO's 3.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CGRO CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF	3.68%	2.48%	2.47%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50	2.60%	3.60%	4.35%	2.66%	0.27%	0.00%	0.08%	1.01%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YXI and CGRO in my portfolio?

YXI and CGRO have a correlation of -0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YXI or CGRO?

YXI has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to CGRO (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YXI dropped -81.15% vs CGRO's -34.99%.

Which ETF is better, YXI or CGRO?

On 1-year performance, YXI leads with 13.74% vs -20.81% for CGRO. On fees, CGRO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CGRO has been the lower-risk option at 6.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YXI or CGRO?

Over the 1-year period, YXI has performed better with a 13.74% return vs -20.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YXI or CGRO?

CGRO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YXI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YXI or CGRO?

CGRO has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 2.60% for YXI.

What is the main difference between YXI and CGRO?

YXI is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CGRO is China Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and CoreValues Alpha. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YXI and 0.75% for CGRO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.