PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YSEP vs. FLJJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YSEP vs. FLJJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September (YSEP) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with YSEP having a 6.38% return and FLJJ slightly lower at 6.09%.


YSEP

1D
0.38%
1M
0.82%
6M
4.71%
YTD
6.38%
1Y
13.85%
3Y*
11.07%
5Y*
10Y*

FLJJ

1D
0.21%
1M
1.14%
6M
5.42%
YTD
6.09%
1Y
11.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YSEP vs. FLJJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YSEP and FLJJ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024

0.66

The correlation between YSEP and FLJJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YSEP vs. FLJJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YSEP
YSEP Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
YSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
YSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
YSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
YSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FLJJ
FLJJ Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FLJJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YSEP vs. FLJJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September (YSEP) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YSEPFLJJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.52

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

3.04

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.22

16.07

-5.85

YSEP vs. FLJJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YSEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the FLJJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YSEP and FLJJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YSEP vs. FLJJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YSEP drawdown since its inception was -22.58%, which is greater than FLJJ's maximum drawdown of -6.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YSEP and FLJJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YSEPFLJJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.58%

-6.91%

-15.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.43%

-3.86%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.09%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.06%

-0.76%

-3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

0.73%

+0.63%

Volatility

YSEP vs. FLJJ - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September (YSEP) has a higher volatility of 1.75% compared to Allianzim U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Floor5 Jan/Jul ETF (FLJJ) at 1.10%. This indicates that YSEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YSEPFLJJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.75%

1.10%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.50%

3.83%

+2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.18%

4.54%

+3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.34%

6.14%

+5.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.34%

6.14%

+5.20%

YSEP vs. FLJJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

YSEP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJJ's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

YSEP vs. FLJJ - Dividend Comparison

Neither YSEP nor FLJJ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


YSEP and FLJJ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YSEP has higher volatility (1.75%) compared to FLJJ (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YSEP dropped -22.58% vs FLJJ's -6.91%.

On 1-year performance, YSEP leads with 13.85% vs 11.69% for FLJJ. On fees, FLJJ is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, FLJJ has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YSEP has performed better with a 13.85% return vs 11.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLJJ is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for YSEP.

YSEP and FLJJ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for YSEP and 0.74% for FLJJ.

FLJJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YSEP and FLJJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer