PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YSEP vs. BUFQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

YSEP vs. BUFQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September (YSEP) and FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

YSEP vs. BUFQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
YSEP
FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September
1.48%19.88%4.63%15.48%4.69%
BUFQ
FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF
-0.95%14.03%16.41%35.51%0.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YSEP achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly higher than BUFQ's -0.95% return.


YSEP

1D
0.88%
1M
-1.90%
YTD
1.48%
6M
3.25%
1Y
16.15%
3Y*
11.13%
5Y*
10Y*

BUFQ

1D
0.51%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
-0.95%
6M
1.78%
1Y
18.25%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


YSEP vs. BUFQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

YSEP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFQ's 1.10% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

YSEP vs. BUFQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YSEP
YSEP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
YSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
YSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
YSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
YSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFQ
BUFQ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BUFQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YSEP vs. BUFQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September (YSEP) and FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YSEPBUFQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

1.32

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.40

2.07

+0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

2.14

+0.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.16

11.76

-0.59

YSEP vs. BUFQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YSEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the BUFQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YSEP and BUFQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YSEPBUFQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

1.32

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.24

-0.69

Correlation

The correlation between YSEP and BUFQ is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

YSEP vs. BUFQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither YSEP nor BUFQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

YSEP vs. BUFQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YSEP drawdown since its inception was -22.58%, which is greater than BUFQ's maximum drawdown of -15.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YSEP and BUFQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


YSEPBUFQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.58%

-15.74%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.65%

-8.83%

+3.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.69%

-2.37%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.28%

-2.41%

-1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

1.61%

-0.16%

Volatility

YSEP vs. BUFQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest International Equity Buffer ETF - September (YSEP) is 4.00%, while FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that YSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


YSEPBUFQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

4.28%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.79%

6.78%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.40%

13.87%

-4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.50%

13.56%

-2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.50%

13.56%

-2.06%