YQQQ vs. QYLG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

YQQQ (YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF) and QYLG (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YQQQ is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while QYLG is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. YQQQ is actively managed, while QYLG is passively managed. Over the past year, YQQQ returned -7.48% vs 24.48% for QYLG. At a correlation of -0.92, they often move in opposite directions. YQQQ charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLG.

Performance

YQQQ vs. QYLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YQQQ achieves a -4.79% return, which is significantly lower than QYLG's 11.95% return.

YQQQ

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 4.23%
• 6M: -4.70%
• YTD: -4.79%
• 1Y: -7.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLG

• 1D: -1.62%
• 1M: -1.59%
• 6M: 10.67%
• YTD: 11.95%
• 1Y: 24.48%
• 3Y*: 18.25%
• 5Y*: 11.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YQQQ vs. QYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
YQQQ YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF	-4.79%	-9.97%	-5.17%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	11.95%	15.29%	10.65%

Correlation

The correlation between YQQQ and QYLG is -0.94, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2024	-0.92

The correlation between YQQQ and QYLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.94 to -0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

YQQQ vs. QYLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YQQQ

YQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5
YQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
YQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
YQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5
YQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
YQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6

QYLG

QYLG Risk / Return Rank: 69
QYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
QYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 63
QYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
QYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YQQQ vs. QYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YQQQ	QYLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.54	1.71	-2.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.67	2.35	-3.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.31	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	2.92	-3.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.79	12.24	-13.03

YQQQ vs. QYLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YQQQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the QYLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YQQQ and QYLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YQQQ vs. QYLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YQQQ drawdown since its inception was -29.10%, roughly equal to the maximum QYLG drawdown of -29.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YQQQ and QYLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	YQQQ	QYLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.10%	-29.98%	+0.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.80%	-8.42%	-13.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.89%	-3.31%	-21.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.96%	-6.33%	-8.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.51%	2.00%	+7.51%

Volatility

YQQQ vs. QYLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ) is 5.41%, while Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that YQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YQQQ	QYLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.41%	6.28%	-0.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.70%	12.34%	-0.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.94%	14.40%	-0.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.55%	18.31%	-1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.55%	18.06%	-1.51%

YQQQ vs. QYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

YQQQ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLG's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

YQQQ vs. QYLG - Dividend Comparison

YQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.72%, more than QYLG's 16.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	16.75%	17.93%	25.27%	5.43%	6.91%	10.15%	1.44%
YQQQ YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF	29.72%	31.71%	7.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YQQQ and QYLG in my portfolio?

YQQQ and QYLG have a correlation of -0.94, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YQQQ or QYLG?

QYLG has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to YQQQ (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YQQQ dropped -29.10% vs QYLG's -29.98%.

Which ETF is better, YQQQ or QYLG?

On 1-year performance, QYLG leads with 24.48% vs -7.48% for YQQQ. On fees, QYLG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, YQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YQQQ or QYLG?

Over the 1-year period, QYLG has performed better with a 24.48% return vs -7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YQQQ or QYLG?

QYLG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for YQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YQQQ or QYLG?

YQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 29.72%, compared with 16.75% for QYLG.

What is the main difference between YQQQ and QYLG?

YQQQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLG is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for YQQQ and 0.60% for QYLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.