PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YNOT vs. SMOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YNOT vs. SMOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) and Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (SMOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YNOT achieves a 12.66% return, which is significantly lower than SMOX's 20.87% return.


YNOT

1D
2.33%
1M
-0.24%
6M
8.03%
YTD
12.66%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.88%

SMOX

1D
1.02%
1M
0.84%
6M
12.83%
YTD
20.87%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.42M$2.24M$1.08M
$6.36M$3.62M$1.68M

YNOT vs. SMOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
YNOT
Horizon Digital Frontier ETF
12.66%-1.23%
SMOX
Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
20.87%0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between YNOT and SMOX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

0.67

YNOT vs. SMOX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YNOT
SMOX

Technology

49.2%
16.5%

Industrials

17.4%
22.6%

Communication Services

14.3%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
10.5%

Basic Materials

7.5%
3.6%

Financial Services

1.8%
15.4%

Utilities

1.1%
1.8%

Healthcare

0.6%
9.2%

Energy

0.6%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Real Estate

-

7.3%

Technology

YNOT
49.2%
SMOX
16.5%

Industrials

YNOT
17.4%
SMOX
22.6%

Communication Services

YNOT
14.3%
SMOX
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

YNOT
7.5%
SMOX
10.5%

Basic Materials

YNOT
7.5%
SMOX
3.6%

Financial Services

YNOT
1.8%
SMOX
15.4%

Utilities

YNOT
1.1%
SMOX
1.8%

Healthcare

YNOT
0.6%
SMOX
9.2%

Energy

YNOT
0.6%
SMOX
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

YNOT

-

SMOX
4.9%

Real Estate

YNOT

-

SMOX
7.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YNOT vs. SMOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YNOT
YNOT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
YNOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YNOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
YNOT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
YNOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
YNOT Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SMOX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YNOT vs. SMOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) and Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (SMOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YNOTSMOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.82

YNOT vs. SMOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YNOT vs. SMOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YNOT drawdown since its inception was -17.25%, which is greater than SMOX's maximum drawdown of -7.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YNOT and SMOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YNOTSMOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.25%

-7.76%

-9.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.12%

-0.91%

-8.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-1.40%

-3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.24%

Volatility

YNOT vs. SMOX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YNOTSMOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.80%

15.02%

+10.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.25%

15.02%

+10.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.25%

15.02%

+10.23%

YNOT vs. SMOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both YNOT and SMOX have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

YNOT vs. SMOX - Dividend Comparison

YNOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.


Frequently Asked Questions


YNOT and SMOX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

YNOT and SMOX have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

SMOX has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for YNOT.

YNOT is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMOX is Mid Cap Blend Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YNOT and SMOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer