PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YNOT vs. MEDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YNOT vs. MEDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) and Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YNOT achieves a 21.63% return, which is significantly higher than MEDX's 0.84% return.


YNOT

1D
-1.88%
1M
8.38%
YTD
21.63%
6M
20.04%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MEDX

1D
0.92%
1M
2.85%
YTD
0.84%
6M
0.03%
1Y
29.45%
3Y*
5.77%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YNOT vs. MEDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
YNOT
Horizon Digital Frontier ETF
21.63%11.82%
MEDX
Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF
0.84%19.82%

Correlation

The correlation between YNOT and MEDX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025

0.14

YNOT vs. MEDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YNOT
MEDX

Technology

47.3%

-

Industrials

17.2%

-

Communication Services

13.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%

-

Basic Materials

8.4%

-

Financial Services

1.9%

-

Utilities

1.4%

-

Healthcare

0.8%
100.0%

Energy

0.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

YNOT
47.3%
MEDX

-

Industrials

YNOT
17.2%
MEDX

-

Communication Services

YNOT
13.4%
MEDX

-

Consumer Cyclical

YNOT
8.9%
MEDX

-

Basic Materials

YNOT
8.4%
MEDX

-

Financial Services

YNOT
1.9%
MEDX

-

Utilities

YNOT
1.4%
MEDX

-

Healthcare

YNOT
0.8%
MEDX
100.0%

Energy

YNOT
0.7%
MEDX

-

Consumer Defensive

YNOT

-

MEDX

-

Real Estate

YNOT

-

MEDX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YNOT vs. MEDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YNOT

MEDX
MEDX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
MEDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MEDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YNOT vs. MEDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) and Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

YNOT vs. MEDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YNOTMEDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.77

0.27

+1.51

Drawdowns

YNOT vs. MEDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YNOT drawdown since its inception was -16.73%, smaller than the maximum MEDX drawdown of -23.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YNOT and MEDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YNOTMEDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.73%

-23.10%

+6.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-5.55%

+3.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-6.72%

+2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

Volatility

YNOT vs. MEDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YNOTMEDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.11%

17.88%

+5.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.11%

16.97%

+6.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.11%

16.97%

+6.14%

YNOT vs. MEDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

YNOT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MEDX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

YNOT vs. MEDX - Dividend Comparison

YNOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MEDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.


PositionTTM202520242023
MEDX
Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF
1.22%1.23%1.92%4.94%
YNOT
Horizon Digital Frontier ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YNOT and MEDX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, YNOT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

YNOT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MEDX.

MEDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.00% for YNOT.

YNOT is categorized as Technology Equities, while MEDX is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for YNOT and 0.85% for MEDX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YNOT and MEDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer