PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YNOT vs. BNDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YNOT vs. BNDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) and Horizon Core Bond ETF (BNDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YNOT achieves a 13.83% return, which is significantly higher than BNDY's 0.60% return.


YNOT

1D
1.56%
1M
-0.72%
6M
7.83%
YTD
13.83%
1Y
26.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BNDY

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.37%
6M
0.29%
YTD
0.60%
1Y
6.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YNOT vs. BNDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
YNOT
Horizon Digital Frontier ETF
13.83%12.46%
BNDY
Horizon Core Bond ETF
0.60%5.30%

Correlation

The correlation between YNOT and BNDY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YNOT vs. BNDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YNOT
YNOT Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
YNOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YNOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
YNOT Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
YNOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
YNOT Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDY
BNDY Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BNDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDY Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDY Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YNOT vs. BNDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) and Horizon Core Bond ETF (BNDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YNOTBNDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.24

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.67

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.86

6.86

-2.00

YNOT vs. BNDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YNOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the BNDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YNOT and BNDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YNOT vs. BNDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YNOT drawdown since its inception was -16.73%, which is greater than BNDY's maximum drawdown of -3.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YNOT and BNDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YNOTBNDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.73%

-3.93%

-12.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.73%

-3.93%

-12.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.18%

-1.41%

-6.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-0.66%

-3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.54%

0.96%

+4.58%

Volatility

YNOT vs. BNDY - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) has a higher volatility of 8.54% compared to Horizon Core Bond ETF (BNDY) at 1.52%. This indicates that YNOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YNOTBNDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.54%

1.52%

+7.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.11%

4.27%

+15.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.63%

5.06%

+19.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.53%

5.11%

+19.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.53%

5.11%

+19.42%

YNOT vs. BNDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

YNOT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDY's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

YNOT vs. BNDY - Dividend Comparison

YNOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BNDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%.


PositionTTM2025
BNDY
Horizon Core Bond ETF
5.88%1.89%
YNOT
Horizon Digital Frontier ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YNOT and BNDY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YNOT has higher volatility (8.54%) compared to BNDY (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YNOT dropped -16.73% vs BNDY's -3.93%.

On 1-year performance, YNOT leads with 26.87% vs 6.55% for BNDY. On fees, BNDY is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, BNDY has been the lower-risk option at 1.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YNOT has performed better with a 26.87% return vs 6.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNDY is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for YNOT.

BNDY has the higher dividend yield at 5.88%, compared with 0.00% for YNOT.

YNOT is categorized as Technology Equities, while BNDY is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for YNOT and 0.66% for BNDY.

BNDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YNOT and BNDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer