PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YMAX vs. QDTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YMAX vs. QDTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAX achieves a 2.44% return, which is significantly lower than QDTY's 12.10% return.


YMAX

1D
2.11%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
2.44%
6M
-0.72%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDTY

1D
1.83%
1M
1.96%
YTD
12.10%
6M
11.87%
1Y
33.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YMAX vs. QDTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YMAX and QDTY is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.77

The correlation between YMAX and QDTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

YMAX vs. QDTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YMAX
QDTY

Technology

68.7%
53.7%

Financial Services

13.8%
0.2%

Communication Services

6.9%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.8%
12.2%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.1%

Industrials

1.9%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
7.7%

Healthcare

0.8%
4.2%

Utilities

0.2%
1.4%

Energy

0.1%
0.6%

Real Estate

0.0%
0.1%

Technology

YMAX
68.7%
QDTY
53.7%

Financial Services

YMAX
13.8%
QDTY
0.2%

Communication Services

YMAX
6.9%
QDTY
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

YMAX
4.8%
QDTY
12.2%

Basic Materials

YMAX
2.2%
QDTY
1.1%

Industrials

YMAX
1.9%
QDTY
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

YMAX
0.9%
QDTY
7.7%

Healthcare

YMAX
0.8%
QDTY
4.2%

Utilities

YMAX
0.2%
QDTY
1.4%

Energy

YMAX
0.1%
QDTY
0.6%

Real Estate

YMAX
0.0%
QDTY
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YMAX vs. QDTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YMAX
YMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
YMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

QDTY
QDTY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YMAX vs. QDTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YMAXQDTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.38

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

3.05

-2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.47

11.07

-10.60

YMAX vs. QDTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the QDTY Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAX and QDTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YMAXQDTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

2.12

-1.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.71

-0.10

Drawdowns

YMAX vs. QDTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAX drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, which is greater than QDTY's maximum drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAX and QDTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YMAXQDTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.13%

-23.45%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.13%

-11.10%

-15.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.18%

-3.67%

-5.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-4.47%

-1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.04%

3.05%

+7.99%

Volatility

YMAX vs. QDTY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) has a higher volatility of 8.44% compared to YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) at 6.26%. This indicates that YMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YMAXQDTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.44%

6.26%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.14%

12.86%

+5.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.35%

16.00%

+6.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.25%

26.13%

-2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.25%

26.13%

-2.88%

YMAX vs. QDTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTY's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

YMAX vs. QDTY - Dividend Comparison

YMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 73.42%, more than QDTY's 31.52% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


YMAX and QDTY have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YMAX has higher volatility (8.44%) compared to QDTY (6.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAX dropped -26.13% vs QDTY's -23.45%.

On 1-year performance, QDTY leads with 33.68% vs 5.13% for YMAX. On fees, QDTY is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, QDTY has been the lower-risk option at 6.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QDTY has performed better with a 33.68% return vs 5.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QDTY is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAX.

YMAX has the higher dividend yield at 73.42%, compared with 31.52% for QDTY.

YMAX is categorized as Derivative Income, while QDTY is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAX and 1.01% for QDTY.

QDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YMAX and QDTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer