YMAX vs. NRSH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

YMAX (YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YMAX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while NRSH is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. YMAX is actively managed, while NRSH is passively managed. Over the past year, YMAX returned 9.02% vs 58.80% for NRSH. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YMAX charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NRSH.

Performance

YMAX vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAX achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 47.92% return.

YMAX

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: 6.76%
• YTD: 6.06%
• 6M: 3.56%
• 1Y: 9.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRSH

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 13.93%
• YTD: 47.92%
• 6M: 46.01%
• 1Y: 58.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YMAX vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
YMAX YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs	6.06%	6.04%	26.26%
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	47.92%	12.95%	-1.56%

Correlation

The correlation between YMAX and NRSH is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2024	0.57

The correlation between YMAX and NRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

YMAX vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	YMAX	NRSH
Technology	68.7%	35.5%
Financial Services	13.8%	-
Communication Services	6.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.8%	-
Basic Materials	2.2%	-
Industrials	1.9%	58.7%
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	-
Healthcare	0.8%	-
Utilities	0.2%	-
Energy	0.1%	2.5%
Real Estate	0.0%	5.8%

Return for Risk

YMAX vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YMAX

YMAX Risk / Return Rank: 14
YMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
YMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
YMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
YMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
YMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

NRSH

NRSH Risk / Return Rank: 76
NRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
NRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
NRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
NRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
NRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YMAX vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	YMAX	NRSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	2.42	-2.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.70	3.11	-2.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.40	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.35	5.40	-5.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.82	16.86	-16.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

YMAX vs. NRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the NRSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAX and NRSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	YMAX	NRSH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42	2.42	-2.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	1.11	-0.41

Drawdowns

YMAX vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAX drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, which is greater than NRSH's maximum drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAX and NRSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	YMAX	NRSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.13%	-24.01%	-2.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.13%	-10.94%	-15.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.98%	0.00%	-5.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.33%	-5.62%	-0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.99%	3.50%	+7.49%

Volatility

YMAX vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) is 6.22%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that YMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YMAX	NRSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.22%	9.21%	-2.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.10%	20.27%	-3.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.62%	24.44%	-2.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.97%	21.54%	+1.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.97%	21.54%	+1.43%

YMAX vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

YMAX vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison

YMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 72.94%, more than NRSH's 0.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	0.28%	0.42%	0.90%	0.17%
YMAX YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs	72.94%	78.70%	44.20%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YMAX and NRSH in my portfolio?

YMAX and NRSH have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YMAX or NRSH?

NRSH has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to YMAX (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAX dropped -26.13% vs NRSH's -24.01%.

Which ETF is better, YMAX or NRSH?

On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 58.80% vs 9.02% for YMAX. On fees, NRSH is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, YMAX has been the lower-risk option at 6.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YMAX or NRSH?

Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 58.80% return vs 9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YMAX or NRSH?

NRSH is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YMAX or NRSH?

YMAX has the higher dividend yield at 72.94%, compared with 0.28% for NRSH.

What is the main difference between YMAX and NRSH?

YMAX is categorized as Derivative Income, while NRSH is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAX and 0.75% for NRSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.