PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YMAX vs. FEAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YMAX vs. FEAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


YMAX

1D
1.76%
1M
-1.93%
6M
5.27%
YTD
0.68%
1Y
-2.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.68%

FEAT

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.31M$11.31M$14.54M

YMAX vs. FEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
YMAX
YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs
0.68%6.04%-5.33%
FEAT
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF
-6.78%-4.21%-9.44%

Correlation

The correlation between YMAX and FEAT is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2024

0.77

The correlation between YMAX and FEAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YMAX vs. FEAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YMAX
YMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
YMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FEAT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YMAX vs. FEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF (FEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YMAXFEATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.20

YMAX vs. FEAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YMAX vs. FEAT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YMAXFEATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.72%

Volatility

YMAX vs. FEAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YMAXFEATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.51%

YMAX vs. FEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FEAT's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

YMAX vs. FEAT - Dividend Comparison

YMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 71.74%, while FEAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
FEAT
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF
77.86%76.35%0.00%
YMAX
YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs
71.74%78.70%44.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


YMAX and FEAT have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FEAT is cheaper at 1.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FEAT is cheaper with a 1.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.33% for YMAX.

FEAT has the higher dividend yield at 77.86%, compared with 71.74% for YMAX.

Their fees differ too: 1.33% for YMAX and 1.28% for FEAT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YMAX and FEAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer