YMAX vs. AAPW

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

YMAX (YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs) and AAPW (AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YMAX returned -6.89% vs 61.94% for AAPW. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YMAX charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AAPW.

Performance

YMAX vs. AAPW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAX achieves a -0.74% return, which is significantly lower than AAPW's 21.74% return.

YMAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -4.39%
• 6M: -3.15%
• YTD: -0.74%
• 1Y: -6.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.25%

AAPW

• 1D: -2.91%
• 1M: 11.04%
• 6M: 31.34%
• YTD: 21.74%
• 1Y: 61.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YMAX vs. AAPW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
YMAX YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs	-0.74%	-0.56%
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF	21.74%	8.71%

Correlation

The correlation between YMAX and AAPW is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.38

YMAX vs. AAPW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	YMAX	AAPW
Technology	61.0%	13.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.6%	-
Communication Services	7.2%	-
Financial Services	5.5%	-
Industrials	5.4%	-
Healthcare	5.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	-
Real Estate	1.6%	-
Energy	1.3%	-
Utilities	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

YMAX vs. AAPW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YMAX

YMAX Risk / Return Rank: 7
YMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
YMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
YMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
YMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
YMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

AAPW

AAPW Risk / Return Rank: 80
AAPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
AAPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AAPW Omega Ratio Rank: 82
AAPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
AAPW Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YMAX vs. AAPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YMAX	AAPW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	2.09	-2.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.24	2.81	-3.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.36	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.26	3.59	-3.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.60	8.55	-9.15

YMAX vs. AAPW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the AAPW Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAX and AAPW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YMAX vs. AAPW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAX drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum AAPW drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAX and AAPW.

Drawdown Indicators

	YMAX	AAPW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.13%	-36.28%	+10.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.13%	-17.36%	-8.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.00%	-2.91%	-9.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.48%	-10.64%	+4.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.52%	7.27%	+4.25%

Volatility

YMAX vs. AAPW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) is 6.50%, while AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) has a volatility of 12.17%. This indicates that YMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YMAX	AAPW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.50%	12.17%	-5.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.15%	23.14%	-2.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.99%	29.86%	-5.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.53%	35.02%	-11.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.53%	35.02%	-11.49%

YMAX vs. AAPW - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than AAPW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

YMAX vs. AAPW - Dividend Comparison

YMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.50%, more than AAPW's 29.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF	29.42%	28.83%	0.00%
YMAX YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs	74.50%	78.70%	44.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YMAX and AAPW in my portfolio?

YMAX and AAPW have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YMAX or AAPW?

AAPW has higher volatility (12.17%) compared to YMAX (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAX dropped -26.13% vs AAPW's -36.28%.

Which ETF is better, YMAX or AAPW?

On 1-year performance, AAPW leads with 61.94% vs -6.89% for YMAX. On fees, AAPW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, YMAX has been the lower-risk option at 6.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YMAX or AAPW?

Over the 1-year period, AAPW has performed better with a 61.94% return vs -6.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YMAX or AAPW?

AAPW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YMAX or AAPW?

YMAX has the higher dividend yield at 74.50%, compared with 29.42% for AAPW.

What is the main difference between YMAX and AAPW?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAX and 0.99% for AAPW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.