PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YMAX.AX vs. RDV.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YMAX.AX vs. RDV.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Australian Top 20 Equities Yield Maximiser Complex ETF (YMAX.AX) and Russell Investments High Dividend Australian Shares ETF (RDV.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAX.AX achieves a 3.64% return, which is significantly lower than RDV.AX's 6.55% return. Over the past 10 years, YMAX.AX has underperformed RDV.AX with an annualized return of 5.28%, while RDV.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.60% annualized return.


YMAX.AX

1D
0.26%
1M
2.97%
6M
4.06%
YTD
3.64%
1Y
2.68%
3Y*
5.82%
5Y*
4.64%
10Y*
5.28%
ALL TIME*
4.71%

RDV.AX

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.61%
6M
5.18%
YTD
6.55%
1Y
8.90%
3Y*
11.43%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
7.60%
ALL TIME*
7.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
A$329.73KA$535.42KA$425.19K
A$784.54KA$811.76KA$1.07M

YMAX.AX vs. RDV.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YMAX.AX
Betashares Australian Top 20 Equities Yield Maximiser Complex ETF
3.64%2.55%5.33%10.63%1.82%15.02%-2.73%14.44%-5.59%4.13%
RDV.AX
Russell Investments High Dividend Australian Shares ETF
6.55%12.55%12.31%8.23%2.30%15.36%-5.86%19.92%-9.14%9.86%

Correlation

The correlation between YMAX.AX and RDV.AX is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2012

0.77

The correlation between YMAX.AX and RDV.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YMAX.AX vs. RDV.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YMAX.AX
YMAX.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
YMAX.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAX.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAX.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAX.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAX.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

RDV.AX
RDV.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
RDV.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDV.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDV.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
RDV.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDV.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YMAX.AX vs. RDV.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Australian Top 20 Equities Yield Maximiser Complex ETF (YMAX.AX) and Russell Investments High Dividend Australian Shares ETF (RDV.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YMAX.AXRDV.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.14

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

1.25

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.53

2.35

-1.83

YMAX.AX vs. RDV.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAX.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the RDV.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAX.AX and RDV.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YMAX.AX vs. RDV.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAX.AX drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum RDV.AX drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAX.AX and RDV.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YMAX.AXRDV.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.97%

-40.60%

+8.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.80%

-6.38%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.90%

-10.09%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.73%

-14.71%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.97%

-40.60%

+8.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-1.07%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-5.15%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

3.46%

+0.11%

Volatility

YMAX.AX vs. RDV.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Betashares Australian Top 20 Equities Yield Maximiser Complex ETF (YMAX.AX) is 2.30%, while Russell Investments High Dividend Australian Shares ETF (RDV.AX) has a volatility of 2.44%. This indicates that YMAX.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDV.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YMAX.AXRDV.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

2.44%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.64%

8.20%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.26%

10.39%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.42%

12.20%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.70%

14.78%

-1.08%

YMAX.AX vs. RDV.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAX.AX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than RDV.AX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

YMAX.AX vs. RDV.AX - Dividend Comparison

YMAX.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than RDV.AX's 3.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RDV.AX
Russell Investments High Dividend Australian Shares ETF
3.95%4.60%4.02%4.90%6.65%4.12%3.21%6.54%7.41%5.41%4.44%5.93%
YMAX.AX
Betashares Australian Top 20 Equities Yield Maximiser Complex ETF
4.44%8.05%3.52%6.15%7.34%8.58%8.18%9.01%7.13%6.46%7.18%6.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


YMAX.AX and RDV.AX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RDV.AX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RDV.AX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for YMAX.AX.

They also come from different issuers: BetaShares and Russell. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for YMAX.AX and 0.34% for RDV.AX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YMAX.AX and RDV.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer