RDV.AX vs. STW.AX
RDV.AX (Russell Investments High Dividend Australian Shares ETF) and STW.AX (State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF) are both Australia Equities funds - RDV.AX tracks the Russell Australia High Dividend Index while STW.AX tracks the S&P/ASX 200 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RDV.AX returned 7.60%/yr vs 8.97%/yr for STW.AX. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RDV.AX charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for STW.AX.
Performance
RDV.AX vs. STW.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDV.AX achieves a 6.55% return, which is significantly higher than STW.AX's 4.77% return. Over the past 10 years, RDV.AX has underperformed STW.AX with an annualized return of 7.60%, while STW.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.97% annualized return.
RDV.AX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- 8.90%
- 3Y*
- 11.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.21%
STW.AX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 4.77%
- 1Y
- 6.97%
- 3Y*
- 10.18%
- 5Y*
- 7.94%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A$329.73K | A$535.42K | A$425.19K | |
| A$10.64M | A$10.43M | A$10.02M |
RDV.AX vs. STW.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDV.AX Russell Investments High Dividend Australian Shares ETF | 6.55% | 12.55% | 12.31% | 8.23% | 2.30% | 15.36% | -5.86% | 19.92% | -9.14% | 9.86% |
STW.AX State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF | 4.77% | 10.21% | 11.50% | 12.18% | -1.26% | 16.70% | 1.89% | 23.18% | -2.92% | 11.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDV.AX and STW.AX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2010 | 0.86 |
The correlation between RDV.AX and STW.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDV.AX vs. STW.AX — Risk / Return Rank
RDV.AX
STW.AX
RDV.AX vs. STW.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments High Dividend Australian Shares ETF (RDV.AX) and State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF (STW.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDV.AX | STW.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.09 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 0.68 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.35 | 1.61 | +0.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDV.AX vs. STW.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDV.AX drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, smaller than the maximum STW.AX drawdown of -50.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDV.AX and STW.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDV.AX | STW.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.60% | -50.66% | +10.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.38% | -8.44% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.09% | -13.18% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.71% | -14.82% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.60% | -34.99% | -5.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -1.28% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.15% | -9.78% | +4.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 3.64% | -0.18% |
Volatility
RDV.AX vs. STW.AX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Russell Investments High Dividend Australian Shares ETF (RDV.AX) is 2.44%, while State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF (STW.AX) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that RDV.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STW.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDV.AX | STW.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.44% | 2.73% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.20% | 9.94% | -1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.39% | 12.02% | -1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.20% | 12.70% | -0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.78% | 14.35% | +0.43% |
RDV.AX vs. STW.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDV.AX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than STW.AX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDV.AX vs. STW.AX - Dividend Comparison
RDV.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than STW.AX's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDV.AX Russell Investments High Dividend Australian Shares ETF | 3.95% | 4.60% | 4.02% | 4.90% | 6.65% | 4.12% | 3.21% | 6.54% | 7.41% | 5.41% | 4.44% | 5.93% |
STW.AX State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF | 3.63% | 3.49% | 3.65% | 4.22% | 6.80% | 3.75% | 2.27% | 4.68% | 4.55% | 4.10% | 3.89% | 3.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDV.AX and STW.AX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, STW.AX is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
STW.AX is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for RDV.AX.
RDV.AX tracks Russell Australia High Dividend Index, while STW.AX tracks S&P/ASX 200 Index. They also come from different issuers: Russell and SPDR. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for RDV.AX and 0.05% for STW.AX.
Find the right allocation for RDV.AX and STW.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer