PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDV.AX vs. STW.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDV.AX vs. STW.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Russell Investments High Dividend Australian Shares ETF (RDV.AX) and State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF (STW.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDV.AX achieves a 6.55% return, which is significantly higher than STW.AX's 4.77% return. Over the past 10 years, RDV.AX has underperformed STW.AX with an annualized return of 7.60%, while STW.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.97% annualized return.


RDV.AX

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.61%
6M
5.18%
YTD
6.55%
1Y
8.90%
3Y*
11.43%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
7.60%
ALL TIME*
7.21%

STW.AX

1D
0.20%
1M
1.56%
6M
2.76%
YTD
4.77%
1Y
6.97%
3Y*
10.18%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
8.97%
ALL TIME*
6.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
A$329.73KA$535.42KA$425.19K
A$10.64MA$10.43MA$10.02M

RDV.AX vs. STW.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RDV.AX
Russell Investments High Dividend Australian Shares ETF
6.55%12.55%12.31%8.23%2.30%15.36%-5.86%19.92%-9.14%9.86%
STW.AX
State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF
4.77%10.21%11.50%12.18%-1.26%16.70%1.89%23.18%-2.92%11.55%

Correlation

The correlation between RDV.AX and STW.AX is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2010

0.86

The correlation between RDV.AX and STW.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDV.AX vs. STW.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RDV.AX
RDV.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
RDV.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDV.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDV.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
RDV.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDV.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

STW.AX
STW.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
STW.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STW.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
STW.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
STW.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
STW.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RDV.AX vs. STW.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments High Dividend Australian Shares ETF (RDV.AX) and State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF (STW.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RDV.AXSTW.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.09

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

0.68

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.35

1.61

+0.74

RDV.AX vs. STW.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDV.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is higher than the STW.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDV.AX and STW.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RDV.AX vs. STW.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDV.AX drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, smaller than the maximum STW.AX drawdown of -50.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDV.AX and STW.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDV.AXSTW.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.60%

-50.66%

+10.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.38%

-8.44%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.09%

-13.18%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.71%

-14.82%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.60%

-34.99%

-5.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-1.28%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-9.78%

+4.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

3.64%

-0.18%

Volatility

RDV.AX vs. STW.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments High Dividend Australian Shares ETF (RDV.AX) is 2.44%, while State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF (STW.AX) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that RDV.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STW.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDV.AXSTW.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

2.73%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.20%

9.94%

-1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.39%

12.02%

-1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.20%

12.70%

-0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.78%

14.35%

+0.43%

RDV.AX vs. STW.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDV.AX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than STW.AX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDV.AX vs. STW.AX - Dividend Comparison

RDV.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than STW.AX's 3.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RDV.AX
Russell Investments High Dividend Australian Shares ETF
3.95%4.60%4.02%4.90%6.65%4.12%3.21%6.54%7.41%5.41%4.44%5.93%
STW.AX
State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF
3.63%3.49%3.65%4.22%6.80%3.75%2.27%4.68%4.55%4.10%3.89%3.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDV.AX and STW.AX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, STW.AX is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

STW.AX is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for RDV.AX.

RDV.AX tracks Russell Australia High Dividend Index, while STW.AX tracks S&P/ASX 200 Index. They also come from different issuers: Russell and SPDR. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for RDV.AX and 0.05% for STW.AX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDV.AX and STW.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer