YMAG vs. PEPS

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

YMAG (YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs) and PEPS (Parametric Equity Plus ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YMAG returned 17.23% vs 25.79% for PEPS. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. YMAG charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for PEPS.

Performance

YMAG vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAG achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than PEPS's 11.42% return.

YMAG

• 1D: 2.67%
• 1M: 3.68%
• 6M: 1.85%
• YTD: 2.13%
• 1Y: 17.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.55%

PEPS

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 1.61%
• 6M: 8.66%
• YTD: 11.42%
• 1Y: 25.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF	$4.87K	$5.83K	$15.17K
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs	$11.59M	$13.01M	$15.33M

YMAG vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs	2.13%	18.64%	3.95%
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF	11.42%	20.32%	-1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between YMAG and PEPS is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024	0.83

The correlation between YMAG and PEPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

YMAG vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YMAG

YMAG Risk / Return Rank: 36
YMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
YMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
YMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
YMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
YMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

PEPS

PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 76
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 75
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YMAG vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YMAG	PEPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	1.84	-0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	2.46	-1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.33	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	2.64	-1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.43	11.54	-8.11

YMAG vs. PEPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAG Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the PEPS Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAG and PEPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YMAG vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAG drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, which is greater than PEPS's maximum drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAG and PEPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	YMAG	PEPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.96%	-21.26%	-4.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.38%	-9.80%	-4.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.28%	0.00%	-4.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	-2.66%	-2.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.03%	2.24%	+2.79%

Volatility

YMAG vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) at 3.92%. This indicates that YMAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YMAG	PEPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.70%	3.92%	+3.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.70%	11.01%	+3.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.39%	14.13%	+4.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.21%	18.09%	+3.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.21%	18.09%	+3.12%

YMAG vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAG has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

YMAG vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison

YMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.58%, more than PEPS's 0.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF	0.92%	1.00%	0.17%
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs	50.58%	52.27%	35.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YMAG and PEPS in my portfolio?

YMAG and PEPS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YMAG or PEPS?

YMAG has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to PEPS (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAG dropped -25.96% vs PEPS's -21.26%.

Which ETF is better, YMAG or PEPS?

On 1-year performance, PEPS leads with 25.79% vs 17.23% for YMAG. On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, PEPS has been the lower-risk option at 3.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YMAG or PEPS?

Over the 1-year period, PEPS has performed better with a 25.79% return vs 17.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YMAG or PEPS?

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YMAG or PEPS?

YMAG has the higher dividend yield at 50.58%, compared with 0.92% for PEPS.

What is the main difference between YMAG and PEPS?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAG and 0.10% for PEPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PEPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.