PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YMAG vs. IVVW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YMAG vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAG achieves a -3.07% return, which is significantly lower than IVVW's 4.01% return.


YMAG

1D
-0.87%
1M
-7.55%
YTD
-3.07%
6M
-4.07%
1Y
16.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IVVW

1D
-1.24%
1M
0.16%
YTD
4.01%
6M
4.08%
1Y
17.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YMAG vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
YMAG
YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs
-3.07%18.64%29.07%
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
4.01%11.71%12.76%

Correlation

The correlation between YMAG and IVVW is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2024

0.77

The correlation between YMAG and IVVW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

YMAG vs. IVVW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YMAG
IVVW

Financial Services

99.0%
11.0%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.6%

Energy

-

3.2%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Industrials

-

7.9%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

38.4%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Financial Services

YMAG
99.0%
IVVW
11.0%

Basic Materials

YMAG

-

IVVW
1.7%

Communication Services

YMAG

-

IVVW
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

YMAG

-

IVVW
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

YMAG

-

IVVW
4.6%

Energy

YMAG

-

IVVW
3.2%

Healthcare

YMAG

-

IVVW
8.4%

Industrials

YMAG

-

IVVW
7.9%

Real Estate

YMAG

-

IVVW
1.8%

Technology

YMAG

-

IVVW
38.4%

Utilities

YMAG

-

IVVW
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YMAG vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YMAG
YMAG Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
YMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

IVVW
IVVW Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IVVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVVW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IVVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVVW Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YMAG vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YMAGIVVWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.47

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

2.99

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.84

15.95

-12.11

YMAG vs. IVVW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the IVVW Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAG and IVVW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YMAG vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAG drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, which is greater than IVVW's maximum drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAG and IVVW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YMAGIVVWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.96%

-16.79%

-9.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.38%

-5.81%

-8.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.15%

-1.37%

-7.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.56%

-1.73%

-2.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.35%

1.09%

+3.26%

Volatility

YMAG vs. IVVW - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) at 3.45%. This indicates that YMAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YMAGIVVWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

3.45%

+2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

6.91%

+5.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.68%

8.05%

+8.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.98%

12.69%

+8.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.98%

12.69%

+8.29%

YMAG vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAG has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

YMAG vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison

YMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 53.52%, more than IVVW's 19.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
19.86%18.55%13.72%
YMAG
YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs
53.52%52.27%35.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


YMAG and IVVW have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YMAG has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to IVVW (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAG dropped -25.96% vs IVVW's -16.79%.

On 1-year performance, IVVW leads with 17.28% vs 16.69% for YMAG. On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVVW has been the lower-risk option at 3.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IVVW has performed better with a 17.28% return vs 16.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.

YMAG has the higher dividend yield at 53.52%, compared with 19.86% for IVVW.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAG and 0.25% for IVVW.

IVVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YMAG and IVVW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer