YMAG vs. ARMW

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

YMAG (YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. YMAG charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.

Performance

YMAG vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAG achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 133.71% return.

YMAG

• 1D: 2.67%
• 1M: 3.68%
• 6M: 1.85%
• YTD: 2.13%
• 1Y: 17.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.55%

ARMW

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -28.93%
• 6M: 143.26%
• YTD: 133.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	$3.40M	$4.54M	$4.17M
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs	$11.59M	$13.01M	$15.33M

YMAG vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs	2.13%	2.67%
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	133.71%	-41.28%

Correlation

The correlation between YMAG and ARMW is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.40

YMAG vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	YMAG	ARMW
Financial Services	99.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	18.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

YMAG vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YMAG

YMAG Risk / Return Rank: 36
YMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
YMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
YMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
YMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
YMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

ARMW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YMAG vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YMAG	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.43	—	—

Drawdowns

YMAG vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAG drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAG and ARMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	YMAG	ARMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.96%	-56.50%	+30.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.28%	-52.96%	+48.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	-27.31%	+22.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	YMAG	ARMW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.70%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.70%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.39%	95.78%	-77.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.21%	95.78%	-74.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.21%	95.78%	-74.57%

YMAG vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAG has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

YMAG vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

YMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.58%, less than ARMW's 66.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	66.19%	16.38%	0.00%
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs	50.58%	52.27%	35.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YMAG and ARMW in my portfolio?

YMAG and ARMW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, YMAG or ARMW?

On fees, ARMW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, YMAG or ARMW?

ARMW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YMAG or ARMW?

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 66.19%, compared with 50.58% for YMAG.

What is the main difference between YMAG and ARMW?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAG and 0.99% for ARMW.