PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YLD vs. HYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YLD vs. HYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YLD achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, YLD has outperformed HYG with an annualized return of 5.49%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.65% annualized return.


YLD

1D
0.11%
1M
0.03%
6M
2.89%
YTD
3.38%
1Y
6.14%
3Y*
8.39%
5Y*
4.80%
10Y*
5.49%

HYG

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.17%
6M
1.43%
YTD
1.94%
1Y
5.69%
3Y*
8.18%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
4.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YLD vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YLD
Principal Active High Yield ETF
3.38%6.55%9.19%12.93%-8.78%9.17%1.50%13.58%-3.30%9.12%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.94%8.59%7.97%11.54%-10.98%3.76%4.47%14.09%-2.02%6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between YLD and HYG is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015

0.54

Over the past year, YLD and HYG have become more correlated (0.75) than their long-term average of 0.54, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YLD vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YLD
YLD Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
YLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
YLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
YLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
YLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YLD vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YLDHYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.29

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

2.44

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.73

10.77

-0.04

YLD vs. HYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the HYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YLD and HYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YLD vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YLD drawdown since its inception was -28.34%, smaller than the maximum HYG drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YLD and HYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YLDHYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.34%

-34.25%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

-2.34%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.62%

-4.56%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.89%

-15.79%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.34%

-22.03%

-6.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.09%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.68%

-3.22%

+0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

0.53%

+0.04%

Volatility

YLD vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison

Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) at 0.78%. This indicates that YLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YLDHYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

0.78%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.52%

3.13%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.41%

3.82%

+0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.40%

7.54%

-1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.15%

8.22%

-0.07%

YLD vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

YLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

YLD vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison

YLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than HYG's 5.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.90%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%
YLD
Principal Active High Yield ETF
7.27%7.33%7.12%6.46%6.51%3.92%4.40%4.81%5.42%6.28%4.47%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


YLD and HYG have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YLD has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to HYG (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YLD dropped -28.34% vs HYG's -34.25%.

On 10-year performance, YLD leads with 5.49% vs 4.65% for HYG. On fees, YLD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, YLD has performed better with a 5.49% return vs 4.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YLD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.

YLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.27%, compared with 5.90% for HYG.

They also come from different issuers: Principal and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for YLD and 0.49% for HYG.

HYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YLD and HYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer