PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YLD vs. DIVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YLD vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YLD achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than DIVO's 6.43% return.


YLD

1D
0.48%
1M
1.27%
YTD
3.11%
6M
3.78%
1Y
7.53%
3Y*
8.77%
5Y*
4.83%
10Y*
5.85%

DIVO

1D
0.72%
1M
2.73%
YTD
6.43%
6M
5.62%
1Y
19.84%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YLD vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YLD
Principal Active High Yield ETF
3.11%6.55%9.19%12.93%-8.78%9.17%1.50%13.58%-3.30%9.12%
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.43%17.40%16.22%6.95%-1.46%22.87%12.40%24.90%-3.18%21.41%

Correlation

The correlation between YLD and DIVO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2016

0.46

The correlation between YLD and DIVO shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YLD vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YLD
YLD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
YLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
YLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
YLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
YLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVO
DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YLD vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YLDDIVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

3.12

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.68

11.23

+1.45

YLD vs. DIVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the DIVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YLD and DIVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YLD vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YLD drawdown since its inception was -28.34%, smaller than the maximum DIVO drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YLD and DIVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YLDDIVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.34%

-30.04%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

-5.95%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.62%

-12.12%

+6.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.89%

-13.72%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.19%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-2.61%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

1.65%

-1.07%

Volatility

YLD vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) is 1.34%, while Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) has a volatility of 2.71%. This indicates that YLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YLDDIVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

2.71%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.50%

7.13%

-3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.36%

9.20%

-4.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.39%

11.97%

-5.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.20%

14.83%

-6.63%

YLD vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

YLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

YLD vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison

YLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, more than DIVO's 6.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.36%6.44%4.70%4.67%4.76%4.79%4.91%8.16%5.27%3.83%0.00%0.00%
YLD
Principal Active High Yield ETF
7.25%7.33%7.12%6.46%6.51%3.92%4.40%4.81%5.42%6.28%4.47%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


YLD and DIVO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVO has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to YLD (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YLD dropped -28.34% vs DIVO's -30.04%.

On 5-year performance, DIVO leads with 10.91% vs 4.83% for YLD. On fees, YLD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, YLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YLD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for DIVO.

YLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.25%, compared with 6.36% for DIVO.

YLD is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for YLD and 0.56% for DIVO.

DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YLD and DIVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer