YLD vs. BBHY
YLD (Principal Active High Yield ETF) and BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. YLD is actively managed, while BBHY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, YLD returned 4.77%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for BBHY. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YLD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBHY.
Performance
YLD vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YLD achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly higher than BBHY's 1.73% return.
YLD
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 2.97%
- 6M
- 3.53%
- 1Y
- 7.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.77%
- 10Y*
- 5.73%
BBHY
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 7.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.76%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- —
YLD vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YLD Principal Active High Yield ETF | 2.97% | 6.55% | 9.19% | 12.93% | -8.78% | 9.17% | 1.50% | 13.58% | -3.30% | 9.12% |
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.73% | 8.51% | 7.81% | 11.98% | -10.37% | 3.88% | 5.36% | 14.35% | -2.50% | 6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between YLD and BBHY is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016 | 0.57 |
The correlation between YLD and BBHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
YLD vs. BBHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
YLD
BBHY
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
YLD
BBHY
Basic Materials
YLD
-
BBHY
Communication Services
YLD
-
BBHY
Consumer Cyclical
YLD
-
BBHY
Consumer Defensive
YLD
-
BBHY
Energy
YLD
-
BBHY
Financial Services
YLD
-
BBHY
Healthcare
YLD
-
BBHY
Industrials
YLD
-
BBHY
Technology
YLD
-
BBHY
Utilities
YLD
-
BBHY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YLD vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank
YLD
BBHY
YLD vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YLD | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.39 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 3.00 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.81 | 13.50 | -0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YLD | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 1.97 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.57 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.64 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
YLD vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YLD drawdown since its inception was -28.34%, which is greater than BBHY's maximum drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YLD and BBHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YLD | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.34% | -24.98% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.98% | -2.37% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.62% | -5.00% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.89% | -15.32% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.14% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.70% | -2.37% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 0.53% | +0.04% |
Volatility
YLD vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison
Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) at 1.13%. This indicates that YLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YLD | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 1.13% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.50% | 2.85% | +0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.34% | 3.62% | +0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.39% | 7.26% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.21% | 7.53% | +0.68% |
YLD vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
YLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
YLD vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison
YLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.26%, more than BBHY's 6.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.94% | 7.24% | 7.18% | 6.49% | 5.92% | 4.06% | 4.73% | 4.99% | 5.02% | 4.81% | 1.42% | 0.00% |
YLD Principal Active High Yield ETF | 7.26% | 7.33% | 7.12% | 6.46% | 6.51% | 3.92% | 4.40% | 4.81% | 5.42% | 6.28% | 4.47% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YLD and BBHY have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YLD has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to BBHY (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YLD dropped -28.34% vs BBHY's -24.98%.
On 5-year performance, YLD leads with 4.77% vs 4.12% for BBHY. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BBHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, YLD has performed better with a 4.77% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for YLD.
YLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.26%, compared with 6.94% for BBHY.
They also come from different issuers: Principal and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for YLD and 0.15% for BBHY.
BBHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YLD and BBHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer