YJUN vs. EINC

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

YJUN (FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, YJUN returned 5.94%/yr vs 21.31%/yr for EINC. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YJUN charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

YJUN vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June (YJUN) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YJUN achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 26.77% return.

YJUN

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.11%
• 6M: 3.62%
• YTD: 4.90%
• 1Y: 10.16%
• 3Y*: 9.78%
• 5Y*: 5.94%
• 10Y*: —

EINC

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 28.45%
• YTD: 26.77%
• 1Y: 30.66%
• 3Y*: 28.13%
• 5Y*: 21.31%
• 10Y*: 11.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YJUN vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
YJUN FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June	4.90%	18.77%	1.65%	14.81%	-8.13%	-0.06%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	26.77%	7.11%	42.79%	15.55%	19.18%	-0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between YJUN and EINC is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2021	0.41

The correlation between YJUN and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

YJUN vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	YJUN	EINC
Financial Services	24.3%	-
Industrials	19.2%	0.6%
Technology	12.0%	-
Healthcare	10.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	-
Basic Materials	6.3%	-
Communication Services	5.0%	-
Energy	3.8%	99.4%
Utilities	3.7%	0.6%
Real Estate	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

YJUN vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YJUN

YJUN Risk / Return Rank: 61
YJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
YJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
YJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 60
YJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
YJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 66

EINC

EINC Risk / Return Rank: 78
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YJUN vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June (YJUN) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YJUN	EINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	2.05	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	2.78	-0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.36	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	3.98	-1.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.52	9.80	-0.28

YJUN vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YJUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YJUN and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YJUN vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YJUN drawdown since its inception was -21.53%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YJUN and EINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	YJUN	EINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.53%	-87.55%	+66.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.16%	-7.89%	+3.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.75%	-16.01%	+7.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.53%	-19.87%	-1.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-68.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-3.89%	+3.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.73%	-44.02%	+40.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	3.20%	-2.18%

Volatility

YJUN vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June (YJUN) is 1.77%, while VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that YJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YJUN	EINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.77%	6.16%	-4.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.80%	12.26%	-7.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.23%	15.33%	-9.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.98%	19.58%	-8.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.95%	25.33%	-14.38%

YJUN vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

YJUN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

YJUN vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

YJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	3.49%	4.51%	3.33%	3.77%	2.89%	6.03%	6.69%	9.66%	11.31%	8.53%	9.71%	28.53%
YJUN FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YJUN and EINC in my portfolio?

YJUN and EINC have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YJUN or EINC?

EINC has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to YJUN (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YJUN dropped -21.53% vs EINC's -87.55%.

Which ETF is better, YJUN or EINC?

On 5-year performance, EINC leads with 21.31% vs 5.94% for YJUN. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, YJUN has been the lower-risk option at 1.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YJUN or EINC?

Over the 5-year period, EINC has performed better with a 21.31% return vs 5.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YJUN or EINC?

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for YJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YJUN or EINC?

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.00% for YJUN.

What is the main difference between YJUN and EINC?

YJUN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while EINC is Energy Equities. YJUN tracks MSCI EAFE Index, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for YJUN and 0.45% for EINC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.