PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YIEL.L vs. ACWL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YIEL.L vs. ACWL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor ESG Euro High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (YIEL.L) and Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

YIEL.L is traded in EUR, while ACWL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ACWL.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YIEL.L achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than ACWL.L's 13.22% return. Over the past 10 years, YIEL.L has underperformed ACWL.L with an annualized return of 2.74%, while ACWL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.46% annualized return.


YIEL.L

1D
0.06%
1M
1.02%
YTD
0.46%
6M
1.13%
1Y
3.83%
3Y*
6.51%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*
2.74%

ACWL.L

1D
-0.29%
1M
5.27%
YTD
13.22%
6M
13.28%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
12.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YIEL.L vs. ACWL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YIEL.L
Lyxor ESG Euro High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.46%5.74%6.35%9.75%-11.03%1.61%1.47%10.54%-4.50%4.48%
ACWL.L
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF
13.22%7.94%26.05%12.87%-10.49%29.29%4.12%21.96%2.52%6.31%

Correlation

The correlation between YIEL.L and ACWL.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2015

0.15

Over the past year, YIEL.L and ACWL.L have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YIEL.L vs. ACWL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YIEL.L
YIEL.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
YIEL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YIEL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
YIEL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
YIEL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
YIEL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWL.L
ACWL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ACWL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YIEL.L vs. ACWL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor ESG Euro High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (YIEL.L) and Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YIEL.LACWL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.45

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

3.86

-2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.11

16.22

-11.11

YIEL.L vs. ACWL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YIEL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the ACWL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YIEL.L and ACWL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YIEL.LACWL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

2.47

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

1.66

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

2.16

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

1.83

-1.24

Drawdowns

YIEL.L vs. ACWL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YIEL.L drawdown since its inception was -25.67%, which is greater than ACWL.L's maximum drawdown of -21.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YIEL.L and ACWL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YIEL.LACWL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.67%

-21.44%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.16%

-6.80%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.65%

-20.75%

+17.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.59%

-20.75%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.67%

-21.44%

-4.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.39%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-3.15%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

1.62%

-0.87%

Volatility

YIEL.L vs. ACWL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor ESG Euro High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (YIEL.L) is 0.93%, while Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWL.L) has a volatility of 2.61%. This indicates that YIEL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YIEL.LACWL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

2.61%

-1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

7.42%

-4.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.37%

10.65%

-7.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.41%

18.66%

-13.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.00%

25.08%

-18.08%

YIEL.L vs. ACWL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

YIEL.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWL.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

YIEL.L vs. ACWL.L - Dividend Comparison

YIEL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, while ACWL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWL.L
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YIEL.L
Lyxor ESG Euro High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
4.05%4.07%2.29%3.31%3.55%2.85%3.16%3.67%4.00%4.05%4.80%4.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


YIEL.L and ACWL.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, YIEL.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

YIEL.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACWL.L.

YIEL.L is categorized as European High Yield Bonds, while ACWL.L is Global Equities. YIEL.L tracks Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR, while ACWL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for YIEL.L and 0.45% for ACWL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YIEL.L and ACWL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer