YGOG.NEO vs. UTES.TO
YGOG.NEO (Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) and UTES.TO (Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YGOG.NEO returned 117.79% vs 23.90% for UTES.TO. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. YGOG.NEO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for UTES.TO.
Performance
YGOG.NEO vs. UTES.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YGOG.NEO achieves a 11.84% return, which is significantly lower than UTES.TO's 12.58% return.
YGOG.NEO
- 1D
- -5.89%
- 1M
- -7.46%
- YTD
- 11.84%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- 117.79%
- 3Y*
- 45.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UTES.TO
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 12.58%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 23.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YGOG.NEO vs. UTES.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
YGOG.NEO Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 11.84% | 69.45% | 32.94% |
UTES.TO Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF | 12.58% | 18.66% | -4.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between YGOG.NEO and UTES.TO is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YGOG.NEO vs. UTES.TO — Risk / Return Rank
YGOG.NEO
UTES.TO
YGOG.NEO vs. UTES.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YGOG.NEO) and Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YGOG.NEO | UTES.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.70 | 2.59 | +1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.70 | 3.79 | +0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.46 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.24 | 3.75 | +1.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.77 | 11.90 | +7.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YGOG.NEO | UTES.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70 | 2.59 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.63 | 1.38 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
YGOG.NEO vs. UTES.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YGOG.NEO drawdown since its inception was -33.45%, which is greater than UTES.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YGOG.NEO and UTES.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YGOG.NEO | UTES.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.45% | -10.19% | -23.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.82% | -6.39% | -15.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.00% | -1.86% | -9.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -2.62% | -4.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.78% | 2.03% | +3.75% |
Volatility
YGOG.NEO vs. UTES.TO - Volatility Comparison
Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YGOG.NEO) has a higher volatility of 11.09% compared to Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF (UTES.TO) at 2.96%. This indicates that YGOG.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTES.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YGOG.NEO | UTES.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.09% | 2.96% | +8.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.74% | 7.51% | +15.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.05% | 9.28% | +22.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.95% | 11.01% | +21.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.95% | 11.01% | +21.94% |
YGOG.NEO vs. UTES.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
YGOG.NEO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than UTES.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
YGOG.NEO vs. UTES.TO - Dividend Comparison
YGOG.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.07%, less than UTES.TO's 17.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTES.TO Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund ETF | 17.48% | 18.30% | 6.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YGOG.NEO Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 8.07% | 5.84% | 14.19% | 7.22% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YGOG.NEO and UTES.TO have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, YGOG.NEO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
YGOG.NEO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for UTES.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Purpose and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for YGOG.NEO and 0.60% for UTES.TO.
Find the right allocation for YGOG.NEO and UTES.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer