YGOG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

YGOG.NEO (Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) and QQCI.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YGOG.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Purpose, while QQCI.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YGOG.NEO returned 90.89% vs 24.09% for QQCI.TO. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. YGOG.NEO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for QQCI.TO.

Performance

YGOG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YGOG.NEO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YGOG.NEO achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly lower than QQCI.TO's 11.99% return.

YGOG.NEO

• 1D: 7.13%
• 1M: -1.03%
• 6M: 2.29%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 1Y: 90.89%
• 3Y*: 39.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 47.15%

QQCI.TO

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: -4.23%
• 6M: 12.17%
• YTD: 11.99%
• 1Y: 24.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	CA$141.03K	CA$115.67K	CA$152.23K
YGOG.NEO Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF	CA$514.43K	CA$426.69K	CA$501.63K

YGOG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
YGOG.NEO Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF	11.15%	69.46%	17.13%
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	11.99%	12.64%	11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between YGOG.NEO and QQCI.TO is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2024	0.44

YGOG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	YGOG.NEO	QQCI.TO
Communication Services	100.0%	13.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.3%
Energy	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	3.6%
Industrials	-	2.7%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	60.9%
Utilities	-	1.1%

Return for Risk

YGOG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YGOG.NEO

YGOG.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 90
YGOG.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
YGOG.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
YGOG.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 90
YGOG.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
YGOG.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

QQCI.TO

QQCI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 66
QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
QQCI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QQCI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
QQCI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
QQCI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YGOG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YGOG.NEO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YGOG.NEO	QQCI.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	1.47	+1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	2.05	+1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.26	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	2.59	+1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.50	8.57	+2.93

YGOG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YGOG.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YGOG.NEO and QQCI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YGOG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YGOG.NEO drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, which is greater than QQCI.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YGOG.NEO and QQCI.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	YGOG.NEO	QQCI.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.24%	-18.95%	-15.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.09%	-8.48%	-13.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.55%	-5.84%	-5.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.76%	-3.07%	-4.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.74%	2.56%	+5.18%

Volatility

YGOG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO - Volatility Comparison

Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YGOG.NEO) has a higher volatility of 14.42% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) at 4.91%. This indicates that YGOG.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YGOG.NEO	QQCI.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.42%	4.91%	+9.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.92%	11.52%	+16.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.37%	14.92%	+20.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.54%	15.92%	+17.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.54%	15.92%	+17.62%

YGOG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

YGOG.NEO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QQCI.TO's 0.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

YGOG.NEO vs. QQCI.TO - Dividend Comparison

YGOG.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.59%, more than QQCI.TO's 9.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF	9.32%	9.34%	3.17%	0.00%	0.00%
YGOG.NEO Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF	9.59%	5.84%	6.63%	7.24%	0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YGOG.NEO and QQCI.TO in my portfolio?

YGOG.NEO and QQCI.TO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, YGOG.NEO or QQCI.TO?

On fees, QQCI.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, YGOG.NEO or QQCI.TO?

QQCI.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for YGOG.NEO.

What is the main difference between YGOG.NEO and QQCI.TO?

YGOG.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQCI.TO is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Purpose and CI. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for YGOG.NEO and 0.21% for QQCI.TO.