YGOG.NEO vs. METE.TO
YGOG.NEO (Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) and METE.TO (Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YGOG.NEO returned 119.67% vs -5.95% for METE.TO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
YGOG.NEO vs. METE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YGOG.NEO achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly higher than METE.TO's -4.55% return.
YGOG.NEO
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -7.79%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 8.82%
- 1Y
- 119.67%
- 3Y*
- 45.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METE.TO
- 1D
- 5.47%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- -4.55%
- 6M
- -2.86%
- 1Y
- -5.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YGOG.NEO vs. METE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YGOG.NEO Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 10.76% | 65.03% |
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | -4.55% | -0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between YGOG.NEO and METE.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YGOG.NEO vs. METE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
YGOG.NEO
METE.TO
YGOG.NEO vs. METE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YGOG.NEO) and Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YGOG.NEO | METE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.77 | -0.16 | +3.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.77 | 0.02 | +4.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.00 | +0.60 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.52 | -0.17 | +5.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.61 | -0.36 | +20.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YGOG.NEO | METE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.77 | -0.16 | +3.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.62 | -0.09 | +1.71 |
Drawdowns
YGOG.NEO vs. METE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YGOG.NEO drawdown since its inception was -33.45%, smaller than the maximum METE.TO drawdown of -40.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YGOG.NEO and METE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YGOG.NEO | METE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.45% | -40.10% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.82% | -35.48% | +13.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.86% | -22.07% | +10.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.59% | -15.68% | +8.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.83% | 16.51% | -10.68% |
Volatility
YGOG.NEO vs. METE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YGOG.NEO) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) at 9.99%. This indicates that YGOG.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than METE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YGOG.NEO | METE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.10% | 9.99% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.75% | 28.26% | -5.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.02% | 36.57% | -4.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.94% | 42.08% | -9.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.94% | 42.08% | -9.14% |
YGOG.NEO vs. METE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both YGOG.NEO and METE.TO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
YGOG.NEO vs. METE.TO - Dividend Comparison
YGOG.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.15%, less than METE.TO's 25.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METE.TO Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 25.77% | 21.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YGOG.NEO Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 8.15% | 5.84% | 14.19% | 7.22% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YGOG.NEO and METE.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
YGOG.NEO and METE.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
They also come from different issuers: Purpose and Harvest Portfolios Group.
Find the right allocation for YGOG.NEO and METE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer